I was just going to suggest outputting both.  That works for me.

@purplecabbage
risingj.com


On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson <bra...@chromium.org>wrote:

> Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both cordova_plugins.js
> and cordova_plugins.json for a while.
>
> Braden
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson <bra...@chromium.org
> >wrote:
>
> > Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman
> > generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using
> > sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js.
> >
> > In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the
> > change to use a .js file and <script> tag looks fine. It's hard to make
> > Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version of
> > cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here?
> >
> > Braden
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS
> >>
> >> The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows
> Phone
> >> *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that Jesse
> >> converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to
> apache's
> >> master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to
> the
> >> cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach
> >> throws an "Access Denied" error on WP*.
> >>
> >> With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to include
> >> this bit of functionality.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL
> >>
> >> On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, "Shazron" <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I
> >> >wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all
> the
> >> >rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I can
> >> get
> >> >that done.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I
> >> >>will
> >> >> tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise.
> >> >>
> >> >> On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, "James Jong" <wjamesj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones
> Shaz
> >> >> >mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562.
> >> >> >-James Jong
> >> >> >
> >> >> >On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org>
> >> >>wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely:
> >> >> >> - Those filed by Abel MuiƱo (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185)
> >> >> >> - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534)
> >> >> >> - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS
> >> >> >>(Jesse
> >> >> >> brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I was also planning on working on adding some
> Plugin-behaving-nicely
> >> >> >>checks
> >> >> >> on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends
> more
> >> >> >>than
> >> >> >> 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I
> >> clearly
> >> >> >>won't
> >> >> >> get this all done in the next few hours :P.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus
> more
> >> >>on
> >> >> >> 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some more,
> >> >>and
> >> >> >> hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool (Steven - I'm
> >> >>looking
> >> >> >>at
> >> >> >> you for the uploading a release part :P).
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> Thanks Jeff!
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, "Jeffrey Heifetz" <jheif...@blackberry.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>> Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out CB-3797,
> >> >> >>>>CB-3799
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, "Filip Maj" <f...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>> Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? I'd
> >> >>like
> >> >> >>>>>to
> >> >> >>>>> refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of.
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, "Bryan Higgins" <br...@bryanhiggins.net>
> >> >>wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> For BB10, we're working on moving out the environment settings
> >> >>from
> >> >> >>>>>> project
> >> >> >>>>>> to HOME.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> That work is pretty much done. We should have it tested and
> >> >> >>>>>>committed
> >> >> >>>>>> within the next few hours.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland
> >> >><iclell...@google.com
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could
> be a
> >> >> >>>>>>> candidate
> >> >> >>>>>>> for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that will
> >> >>accept
> >> >> >>>>>>>a
> >> >> >>>>>>> Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object.
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9)
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take care
> of
> >> >>it
> >> >> >>>>>>> post-rc1.
> >> >> >>>>>>> Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning.
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com>
> >> >>wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone still
> >> >> >>>>>>>>working
> >> >> >>>>>>> on
> >> >> >>>>>>>> something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9?
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, "Michael Brooks" <
> >> mich...@michaelbrooks.ca>
> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Monday RC1 sounds good to me.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron <
> shaz...@gmail.com
> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Looking at iOS 2.9.0:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Definitely as you said:
> >> >> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Then all iOS cli and docs issues.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix)
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to
> >> >>investigate,
> >> >> >>> no
> >> >> >>>>>>> fix
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> yet)
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there is a
> >> PR
> >> >>to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> investigate)
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix in the
> >> >> issue,
> >> >> >>>>>>> to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> evaluate)
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534 (the
> reporter
> >> >>has
> >> >> >>>>>>> filed
> >> >> >>>>>>>> an
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe fix)
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Maybe this Untappd issue:
> >> >> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer <
> >> >> >>>>>>> lorin.beer....@gmail.com
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> be the leaf in the wind, Shaz.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be resolved? I am
> >> >>aware
> >> >> >>>>>>> of a
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> bug
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> in
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything else you
> want
> >> >>in?
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron
> >> >><shaz...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I wish I could say there was more velocity in the iOS /
> OS
> >> >>X
> >> >> >>>>>>> repos
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> but
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> there hasn't been any with me being away at WWDC this
> >> week,
> >> >> >>>>>>> but if
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> that's
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> where the wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to get
> >> >>more
> >> >> >>>>>>> issues
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> resolved by rc2.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> <lorin.beer....@gmail.com
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, let's tackle this early
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse
> >> >> >>>>>>> <purplecabb...@gmail.com
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> meh
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @purplecabbage
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> risingj.com
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj
> >> >> >>>>>>> <f...@adobe.com>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huge +1!
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, "Joe Bowser" <bows...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know this is pretty soon, but how does a 2.9.0rc1
> on
> >> >> >>>>>>> Monday
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> sound?
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since this is supposed to be a hardening release
> >> >> >>>>>>> anyway, I
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> don't
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> see
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why we shouldn't start with the RCs.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts?
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >>>> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain
> >> >>confidential
> >> >> >>>> information, privileged material (including material protected
> by
> >> >>the
> >> >> >>>> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute
> >> >> >>>> non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone
> >> other
> >> >> >>>>than
> >> >> >>>> the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this
> >> >> >>>> transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender
> and
> >> >> >>>>delete
> >> >> >>>> this information from your system. Use, dissemination,
> >> >>distribution,
> >> >> >>>>or
> >> >> >>>> reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is
> not
> >> >> >>>> authorized and may be unlawful.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to