Tried your coho commands and they worked well Andrew :) ./cordova-coho/coho create-release-branch --version 2.8.0rc1 -r js -r app-hello-world ./cordova-coho/coho tag-release --version 2.8.0rc1 -r js -r app-hello-world
App and JS are branched/tagged. On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, "Shazron" <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: >I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I >wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all the >rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I can get >that done. > > >On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I >>will >> tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. >> >> On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, "James Jong" <wjamesj...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones Shaz >> >mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. >> >-James Jong >> > >> >On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> >>wrote: >> > >> >> I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: >> >> - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185) >> >> - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) >> >> - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS >> >>(Jesse >> >> brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) >> >> >> >> I was also planning on working on adding some Plugin-behaving-nicely >> >>checks >> >> on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends more >> >>than >> >> 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. >> >> >> >> Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I clearly >> >>won't >> >> get this all done in the next few hours :P. >> >> >> >> So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus more >>on >> >> 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some more, >>and >> >> hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool (Steven - I'm >>looking >> >>at >> >> you for the uploading a release part :P). >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Thanks Jeff! >> >>> >> >>> On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, "Jeffrey Heifetz" <jheif...@blackberry.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out CB-3797, >> >>>>CB-3799 >> >>>> >> >>>> On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, "Filip Maj" <f...@adobe.com> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? I'd >>like >> >>>>>to >> >>>>> refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, "Bryan Higgins" <br...@bryanhiggins.net> >>wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> For BB10, we're working on moving out the environment settings >>from >> >>>>>> project >> >>>>>> to HOME. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> That work is pretty much done. We should have it tested and >> >>>>>>committed >> >>>>>> within the next few hours. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland >><iclell...@google.com >> > >> >>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could be a >> >>>>>>> candidate >> >>>>>>> for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that will >>accept >> >>>>>>>a >> >>>>>>> Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take care of >>it >> >>>>>>> post-rc1. >> >>>>>>> Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> >>wrote: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone still >> >>>>>>>>working >> >>>>>>> on >> >>>>>>>> something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9? >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, "Michael Brooks" <mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Monday RC1 sounds good to me. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Looking at iOS 2.9.0: >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Definitely as you said: >> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 >> >>>>>>>>>> Then all iOS cli and docs issues. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix) >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to >>investigate, >> >>> no >> >>>>>>> fix >> >>>>>>>>>> yet) >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there is a PR >>to >> >>>>>>>>>> investigate) >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix in the >> issue, >> >>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>>>> evaluate) >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534 (the reporter >>has >> >>>>>>> filed >> >>>>>>>> an >> >>>>>>>>>> excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe fix) >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Maybe this Untappd issue: >> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer < >> >>>>>>> lorin.beer....@gmail.com >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be resolved? I am >>aware >> >>>>>>> of a >> >>>>>>>>>> bug >> >>>>>>>>>> in >> >>>>>>>>>>> Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything else you want >>in? >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron >><shaz...@gmail.com> >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I wish I could say there was more velocity in the iOS / OS >>X >> >>>>>>> repos >> >>>>>>>>>> but >> >>>>>>>>>>>> there hasn't been any with me being away at WWDC this week, >> >>>>>>> but if >> >>>>>>>>>> that's >> >>>>>>>>>>>> where the wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to get >>more >> >>>>>>> issues >> >>>>>>>>>>>> resolved by rc2. >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer >> >>>>>>>>>> <lorin.beer....@gmail.com >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, let's tackle this early >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse >> >>>>>>> <purplecabb...@gmail.com >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> meh >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @purplecabbage >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> risingj.com >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj >> >>>>>>> <f...@adobe.com> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huge +1! >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, "Joe Bowser" <bows...@gmail.com> >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know this is pretty soon, but how does a 2.9.0rc1 on >> >>>>>>> Monday >> >>>>>>>>>>> sound? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since this is supposed to be a hardening release >> >>>>>>> anyway, I >> >>>>>>>>>> don't >> >>>>>>>>>>> see >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why we shouldn't start with the RCs. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain >>confidential >> >>>> information, privileged material (including material protected by >>the >> >>>> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute >> >>>> non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other >> >>>>than >> >>>> the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this >> >>>> transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and >> >>>>delete >> >>>> this information from your system. Use, dissemination, >>distribution, >> >>>>or >> >>>> reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not >> >>>> authorized and may be unlawful. >> >>> >> >>> >> > >> >>
