JSON files are not valid Javascript code.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does the extension > have to be .js? > > On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, "Jesse" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works for me. > > > >@purplecabbage > >risingj.com > > > > > >On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson > ><[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both > >>cordova_plugins.js > >> and cordova_plugins.json for a while. > >> > >> Braden > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson < > [email protected] > >> >wrote: > >> > >> > Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman > >> > generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using > >> > sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. > >> > > >> > In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the > >> > change to use a .js file and <script> tag looks fine. It's hard to > >>make > >> > Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version > >>of > >> > cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? > >> > > >> > Braden > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS > >> >> > >> >> The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows > >> Phone > >> >> *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that > >>Jesse > >> >> converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to > >> apache's > >> >> master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to > >> the > >> >> cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach > >> >> throws an "Access Denied" error on WP*. > >> >> > >> >> With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to > >>include > >> >> this bit of functionality. > >> >> > >> >> Thoughts? > >> >> > >> >> [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL > >> >> > >> >> On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, "Shazron" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 > >>that I > >> >> >wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all > >> the > >> >> >rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I > >>can > >> >> get > >> >> >that done. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to > >>me. I > >> >> >>will > >> >> >> tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, "James Jong" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones > >> Shaz > >> >> >> >mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. > >> >> >> >-James Jong > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve <[email protected] > > > >> >> >>wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: > >> >> >> >> - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. > >>cb-3185) > >> >> >> >> - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) > >> >> >> >> - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and > >>iOS > >> >> >> >>(Jesse > >> >> >> >> brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> I was also planning on working on adding some > >> Plugin-behaving-nicely > >> >> >> >>checks > >> >> >> >> on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends > >> more > >> >> >> >>than > >> >> >> >> 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I > >> >> clearly > >> >> >> >>won't > >> >> >> >> get this all done in the next few hours :P. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus > >> more > >> >> >>on > >> >> >> >> 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some > >>more, > >> >> >>and > >> >> >> >> hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool (Steven - I'm > >> >> >>looking > >> >> >> >>at > >> >> >> >> you for the uploading a release part :P). > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> > >>wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> Thanks Jeff! > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, "Jeffrey Heifetz" > >><[email protected]> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>>> Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out > >>CB-3797, > >> >> >> >>>>CB-3799 > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >>>> On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? > >>I'd > >> >> >>like > >> >> >> >>>>>to > >> >> >> >>>>> refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of. > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, "Bryan Higgins" > >><[email protected]> > >> >> >>wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>> For BB10, we're working on moving out the environment > >>settings > >> >> >>from > >> >> >> >>>>>> project > >> >> >> >>>>>> to HOME. > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>> That work is pretty much done. We should have it tested and > >> >> >> >>>>>>committed > >> >> >> >>>>>> within the next few hours. > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland > >> >> >><[email protected] > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could > >> be a > >> >> >> >>>>>>> candidate > >> >> >> >>>>>>> for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that > >>will > >> >> >>accept > >> >> >> >>>>>>>a > >> >> >> >>>>>>> Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take > >>care > >> of > >> >> >>it > >> >> >> >>>>>>> post-rc1. > >> >> >> >>>>>>> Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning. > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj > >><[email protected]> > >> >> >>wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone > >>still > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>working > >> >> >> >>>>>>> on > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9? > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, "Michael Brooks" < > >> >> [email protected]> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Monday RC1 sounds good to me. > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron < > >> [email protected] > >> >> > > >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Looking at iOS 2.9.0: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Definitely as you said: > >> >> >> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Then all iOS cli and docs issues. > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix) > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to > >> >> >>investigate, > >> >> >> >>> no > >> >> >> >>>>>>> fix > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> yet) > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there > >>is a > >> >> PR > >> >> >>to > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> investigate) > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix in > >>the > >> >> >> issue, > >> >> >> >>>>>>> to > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> evaluate) > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534 (the > >> reporter > >> >> >>has > >> >> >> >>>>>>> filed > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> an > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe fix) > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Maybe this Untappd issue: > >> >> >> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer < > >> >> >> >>>>>>> [email protected] > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be resolved? I > >>am > >> >> >>aware > >> >> >> >>>>>>> of a > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> bug > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> in > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything else you > >> want > >> >> >>in? > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron > >> >> >><[email protected]> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I wish I could say there was more velocity in the > >>iOS / > >> OS > >> >> >>X > >> >> >> >>>>>>> repos > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> but > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> there hasn't been any with me being away at WWDC this > >> >> week, > >> >> >> >>>>>>> but if > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> that's > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> where the wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to > >>get > >> >> >>more > >> >> >> >>>>>>> issues > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> resolved by rc2. > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, let's tackle this early > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse > >> >> >> >>>>>>> <[email protected] > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> meh > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @purplecabbage > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> risingj.com > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj > >> >> >> >>>>>>> <[email protected]> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huge +1! > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, "Joe Bowser" > >><[email protected]> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know this is pretty soon, but how does a > >>2.9.0rc1 > >> on > >> >> >> >>>>>>> Monday > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> sound? > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since this is supposed to be a hardening release > >> >> >> >>>>>>> anyway, I > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> don't > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> see > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why we shouldn't start with the RCs. > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts? > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> > >>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> >> >>>> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain > >> >> >>confidential > >> >> >> >>>> information, privileged material (including material > >>protected > >> by > >> >> >>the > >> >> >> >>>> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or > >>constitute > >> >> >> >>>> non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone > >> >> other > >> >> >> >>>>than > >> >> >> >>>> the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received > >>this > >> >> >> >>>> transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender > >> and > >> >> >> >>>>delete > >> >> >> >>>> this information from your system. Use, dissemination, > >> >> >>distribution, > >> >> >> >>>>or > >> >> >> >>>> reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is > >> not > >> >> >> >>>> authorized and may be unlawful. > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > >
