I mean, can I help you with this. Not quite sure where that 'u' came from.
John M. Wargo -----Original Message----- From: Wargo, John [mailto:john.wa...@sap.com] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 9:51 AM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: RE: config.xml discussion, we need to talk Mike, Can UI help you with this? John M. Wargo Mobile Platform Product Management SAP | Charlotte, NC | USA Office: +1 704.321.0265 | Mobile: +1 704.249.7476 Email: john.wa...@sap.com Twitter: @johnwargo -----Original Message----- From: Mike Billau [mailto:mike.bil...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 3:02 PM To: dev@cordova.apache.org; bows...@apache.org Subject: Re: config.xml discussion, we need to talk Would it be helpful to document both of the supported workflows? We kind of have this documentation in place under "Development Paths" section in the Overview, but I think we could edit this section to make it more clear that there really are two different development paths, and both are okay and supported. We could include pros and cons of each and link to the appropriate documentation (which is mostly written already, under "The Command-line Interface" and the various "{Platform} Command-line Tools" guides.) If there are no objections I can add this into Jira and start working on it. On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Anis KADRI <anis.ka...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sweet. So I think we all agree (expect Joe perhaps?) that both > > approaches should be supported :-) > > I don't care. I'll keep using the source and plugman and making sure > that works, and I'll just ignore the complaints and the bugs regarding > the CLI. I personally think that one way will eventually win out, but > it'll probably be years down the road, and I'm not even sure if I'll > still be working on Cordova when that happens, so I won't worry about > it. >
