I think the Apache Way specifies that we have to vote on the final release, not the tag. If we can get clarification from an ASF person who knows the policy and isn't a troll, that would be helpful.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Jesse <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Moving to a 3.6.1 sounds like the only way forward, but let's not publish > it until AFTER a vore. > > We should be voting on what we see in the git-repos ( after verifying that > it is identical to the packaged binaries) > We should be testing via --usegit all the npm stuff should just be gravy. > > Carlos: > - The problem is that we won't be voting on what is already published > > @purplecabbage > risingj.com > > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Marcel sounds good approach for consistency and less confusion. but if > > something goes wrong with voting again, we will have to do a 3.6.2 > > Can we publish to npm as it as 3.6.1-rc1, I think in the past we use to > > something similar with with git tags. > > If vote passes then we can publish the same content as 3.6.1, and > unpublish > > 3.6.1-rc from npm > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> > wrote: > > > > > That npm issue sounds like a blocker for voting on RC's that have been > > > uploaded to npm, since it means we have to update the package after > > > successful vote. > > > > > > Not sure of workarounds. > > > > > > -Michal > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Marcel Kinard <cmarc...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > One idea would be to bump the version of > > > > android/amazon-fireos/windows/wp8 to 3.6.1, both in dist.a.o and in > > npm. > > > > And we could leave all the other platforms/tools at 3.6.0. Except > that > > we > > > > would also need to bump those references in > > > > cordova-lib/cordova-lib/src/platforms.js, and then bump the reference > > in > > > > cordova-cli to use this newer cordova-lib. Not pretty, but it should > > work > > > > technically. Sigh. > > > > > > > > If we are going with this approach, I'd actually suggest to bump the > > > > version of everything to be 3.6.1, for consistency and less user > > > confusion. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Santana > > <csantan...@gmail.com> > > >
