A quick question - does it make sense to move the main build bot master to an Apache Infrastructure? We could then have slaves be independent developers, or by folks who already run medic (like google and msopentech). This was the sort of federated model we were looking at.
MSOpenTech's medic slaves are based on Azure VMs and can be connected from an external master. Not sure if the same can work for Google's slaves too. I am hoping that if we have such an infrastructure, we could run Medic with our nightlies, giving us more confidence. We could get to an ideal state where our tests are green, and a red in medic really means that stuff is broken. -----Original Message----- From: Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 10:46 AM To: Max Woghiren; [email protected] Subject: RE: FW: Adding Windows tests to ci.cordova.io Hi, I'm going to make a step forward in this direction by adding required changes to Medic and additional improvements today (see below). Please let me know if anyone has some additional ideas, want to discuss/collaborate. 1. Merged Windows/Unix sample config files so that we have single config for buildbot master which will support all type of slaves/tests. 2. Make Android test to run on both Windows and Unix. 3. Rely on mobile-spec to create test app (currently Medic just duplicates those steps) 4. Add required fixes so that platform tests run correctly (currently broken) -Sergey -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michal Mocny Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 7:05 AM To: Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH) Cc: Michal Mocny; Max Woghiren; [email protected] Subject: Re: FW: Adding Windows tests to ci.cordova.io I think Federating was the option last discussed, but I'm not actually in-the-know about how the details. -Michal On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH) < [email protected]> wrote: > I will not be at PGDay, but Kirk (from MSOpenTech) can cover this. > Does it make sense to move this to Apache infrastructure? Should we > also look at a model where more people can simply set up machines and > we could federate the results back to the main server ? > > > > - FirefoxOS, Amazon FireOS, Ubuntu folks and other platforms – > what is your take on this ? > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of > *Michal Mocny > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 7, 2014 6:06 PM > *To:* Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH); Max Woghiren > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: FW: Adding Windows tests to ci.cordova.io > > > > David from our team historically took care of most of it, but has > moved on to other projects. > > > > Max would like to pick up where David left it, and has started to make > some improvements, but its not really as actively maintained as it was. > Max and I will be at PGDay -- would love to discuss more sustainable > maintenance of CI there, and how best to share effort with other teams. > > > > -Michal > > > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH) < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Adding back to dev list – Jesse’s reply was > > +1 > I would very much like to see this work integrated in the CI. Who is > looking after the CI? > > > From: Jesse [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2014 2:17 PM > To: Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH) > Subject: Re: Adding Windows tests to ci.cordova.io > > > @purplecabbage > risingj.com<http://risingj.com> > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH) > < [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Hi, > > Wanted to ping on this thread. What would be the best way to get > Windows support in the official ci.cordova.org<http://ci.cordova.org> ? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Maria Bukharina [mailto:[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>] > Sent: Friday, October 3, 2014 5:51 AM > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Adding Windows tests to ci.cordova.io<http://ci.cordova.io> > > Hi all, > > I'm working on improvements of medic tests for Windows platform. We > had prepared pull request about supporting of Windows Universal Apps > https://github.com/apache/cordova-medic/pull/16. Seemed that adding > Windows tests to http://ci.cordova.io/ is stuck. Could we please > discuss it again. > > By the way is medic autotests are still best practice for testing cordova? > Seems http://ci.cordova.io/ is broken for a long time. I've found out > that last successful build of Android_Master was at Sep 23 20:15. > > Thanks, > Maria > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
