+1 for testing nightlys and moving to apache infra On Nov 5, 2014 11:33 AM, "Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH)" < panar...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> A quick question - does it make sense to move the main build bot master to > an Apache Infrastructure? We could then have slaves be independent > developers, or by folks who already run medic (like google and msopentech). > This was the sort of federated model we were looking at. > > MSOpenTech's medic slaves are based on Azure VMs and can be connected from > an external master. Not sure if the same can work for Google's slaves too. > > I am hoping that if we have such an infrastructure, we could run Medic > with our nightlies, giving us more confidence. We could get to an ideal > state where our tests are green, and a red in medic really means that stuff > is broken. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) [mailto:v-seg...@microsoft.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 10:46 AM > To: Max Woghiren; dev@cordova.apache.org > Subject: RE: FW: Adding Windows tests to ci.cordova.io > > Hi, > > I'm going to make a step forward in this direction by adding required > changes to Medic and additional improvements today (see below). Please let > me know if anyone has some additional ideas, want to discuss/collaborate. > > 1. Merged Windows/Unix sample config files so that we have single config > for buildbot master which will support all type of slaves/tests. > 2. Make Android test to run on both Windows and Unix. > 3. Rely on mobile-spec to create test app (currently Medic just duplicates > those steps) 4. Add required fixes so that platform tests run correctly > (currently broken) > > -Sergey > -----Original Message----- > From: mmo...@google.com [mailto:mmo...@google.com] On Behalf Of Michal > Mocny > Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 7:05 AM > To: Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH) > Cc: Michal Mocny; Max Woghiren; dev@cordova.apache.org > Subject: Re: FW: Adding Windows tests to ci.cordova.io > > I think Federating was the option last discussed, but I'm not actually > in-the-know about how the details. > > -Michal > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH) < > panar...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > > I will not be at PGDay, but Kirk (from MSOpenTech) can cover this. > > Does it make sense to move this to Apache infrastructure? Should we > > also look at a model where more people can simply set up machines and > > we could federate the results back to the main server ? > > > > > > > > - FirefoxOS, Amazon FireOS, Ubuntu folks and other platforms - > > what is your take on this ? > > > > > > > > *From:* mmo...@google.com [mailto:mmo...@google.com] *On Behalf Of > > *Michal Mocny > > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 7, 2014 6:06 PM > > *To:* Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH); Max Woghiren > > *Cc:* dev@cordova.apache.org > > *Subject:* Re: FW: Adding Windows tests to ci.cordova.io > > > > > > > > David from our team historically took care of most of it, but has > > moved on to other projects. > > > > > > > > Max would like to pick up where David left it, and has started to make > > some improvements, but its not really as actively maintained as it was. > > Max and I will be at PGDay -- would love to discuss more sustainable > > maintenance of CI there, and how best to share effort with other teams. > > > > > > > > -Michal > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH) < > > panar...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > > > Adding back to dev list - Jesse's reply was > > > > +1 > > I would very much like to see this work integrated in the CI. Who is > > looking after the CI? > > > > > > From: Jesse [mailto:purplecabb...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2014 2:17 PM > > To: Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH) > > Subject: Re: Adding Windows tests to ci.cordova.io > > > > > > @purplecabbage > > risingj.com<http://risingj.com> > > > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH) > > < panar...@microsoft.com<mailto:panar...@microsoft.com>> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Wanted to ping on this thread. What would be the best way to get > > Windows support in the official ci.cordova.org<http://ci.cordova.org> ? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Maria Bukharina [mailto:maria.bukhar...@akvelon.com<mailto: > > maria.bukhar...@akvelon.com>] > > Sent: Friday, October 3, 2014 5:51 AM > > To: dev@cordova.apache.org<mailto:dev@cordova.apache.org> > > Subject: Adding Windows tests to ci.cordova.io<http://ci.cordova.io> > > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm working on improvements of medic tests for Windows platform. We > > had prepared pull request about supporting of Windows Universal Apps > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-medic/pull/16. Seemed that adding > > Windows tests to http://ci.cordova.io/ is stuck. Could we please > > discuss it again. > > > > By the way is medic autotests are still best practice for testing > cordova? > > Seems http://ci.cordova.io/ is broken for a long time. I've found out > > that last successful build of Android_Master was at Sep 23 20:15. > > > > Thanks, > > Maria > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org<mailto: > > dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org<mailto: > > dev-h...@cordova.apache.org> > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org >
