Github user riknoll commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/425#issuecomment-209011899
@vladimir-kotikov To clarify the plugin mapper comments: I left in the
scope with the intention that the mapping would fail if the scope was present.
I don't think there is a case for remapping old plugin ids that have a scope
added, because if you are giving a scope then you know what npm package you are
trying to fetch. We should never remap in that scenario and I'll try and
clarify that in the code. As for changing the API, I'm fine with the approach
you suggested (separate class, one function, etc.). I think I just dug myself
into a hole with the initial way I wrote the code and didn't refactor when I
should have :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org
