On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Jason Smith <j...@couch.io> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 18:02, Filipe David Manana <fdman...@apache.org>wrote: > >> +1 on Benoît's comment. >> >> Using erlang_js, emonk or something equivalent should be top priority >> > > I love this idea however as I am responsible for thousands of unrelated > users' couches, I want significant assurance about the security and > sandboxing of a new view server runtime. >
Just a quick point, but running things through emonk would actually provide a more secure sandbox than the current model. All I have left to make emonk a viable alternative to couchjs is to finish up the async request processing so schedulers aren't blocked. > In other words, can CouchDB fix a few bugs in the 1.x branch while working > on major improvements in 2.x? > > Specifically, the bug I cited is something so simple, so stupid, that > CouchDB cannot process HTML form input. In this context, I do not care how > impressive the back-end is. I just want good tools for web developers to > use. I would definitely be frustrated to find myself on the API change > treadmill. > > -- > Jason Smith > Couchio Hosting >
