[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18024788#comment-18024788
]
Philipp Ottlinger commented on RAT-472:
---------------------------------------
1. I'm not sure if I got Claude correctly, but
[https://github.com/apache/openmeetings/blob/master/src/license/asf-license.txt]
seems to lack the correct appendix from
[https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt]
, that contains:
*Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]*
*Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");*
*you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.*
*You may obtain a copy of the License at*
*[http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0]*
*Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software*
*distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,*
*WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.*
*See the License for the specific language governing permissions and*
*limitations under the License.*
As RAT scans for the token " Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0
(the "License");" your file is reported as unapproved.
2. Are the pdf-files in your file tree real PDFs as Tika should be able to
recognize them as binary?
> ASF license reported as non-compliant
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: RAT-472
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-472
> Project: Apache Rat
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Maxim Solodovnik
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.17
>
>
> I've added https://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt to our project sources
> NOTE: `APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.` was *excluded*
> as a result {{org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.16.1:check}} reports this
> file as NON-ASF licensed :(((
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
