Is it just a matter of branching off master and merging all of the CURATOR-3.0 related branches? Yes, that’s my plan anyway.
On August 11, 2015 at 10:39:25 PM, Cameron McKenzie (mckenzie....@gmail.com) wrote: My git knowledge is not deep enough to work out what's going on with the CURATOR-3.0 branch, so I'm happy to go from scratch. Is it just a matter of branching off master and merging all of the CURATOR-3.0 related branches? On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Jordan Zimmerman < jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote: > We need to come to a decision on the CURATOR-3.0 branch. My gut instinct > is to start from scratch. Any other ideas? > > -JZ > > > > On August 11, 2015 at 5:28:30 PM, Cameron McKenzie (mckenzie....@gmail.com) > wrote: > > Also, which branch should the CURATOR-214 fix come off? From memory the > CURATOR-3.0 branch was broken in some capacity. Should I be branching off > CURATOR-3.0-temp or something else? > cheers > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Cameron McKenzie <mckenzie....@gmail.com> > wrote: > Will do. In the meantime could you please have a look at my suggested > solution for CURATOR-228 (It's in the JIRA)? I don't want to start work on > it until we have an agreed solution. > cheers > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Jordan Zimmerman < > jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote: > Hi Cameron, > > Go ahead and do CURATOR-214 - I assigned it to you. > > -JZ > > > > On August 9, 2015 at 6:47:50 PM, Cameron McKenzie (mckenzie....@gmail.com) > wrote: > > Sounds reasonable, what's left for 3.0.0? > > I think that watcher removal is done. So just the host provider ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-213) and new create APIs ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-214). > > I'm happy to pick up the new create APIs if no one else is looking at it. > cheers > > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Jordan Zimmerman < > jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote: > On August 9, 2015 at 5:15:36 PM, Cameron McKenzie (mckenzie....@gmail.com) > wrote: > As for Curator 3.0.0, any ideas when ZK 3.5.x is mean to get out of Alpha? > I've seen some grumblings on the ZK mailing list, but nothing concrete. I > guess we just need to be ready for that date whenever it is. > cheers > Cam > Who knows :) But, I know people are using it in Production so I think we > should just treat it as released software. > > > > -JZ > > > > >
