Sure thing. On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Jordan Zimmerman < jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> Go ahead, if you don’t mind. > > > > On August 11, 2015 at 10:50:52 PM, Cameron McKenzie ( > mckenzie....@gmail.com) wrote: > > Ok, I can give that a spin if you like, or I'm happy for you to do it and > I'll branch from there for CURATOR-214. > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Jordan Zimmerman < > jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote: > >> Is it just a matter of >> branching off master and merging all of the CURATOR-3.0 related branches? >> >> Yes, that’s my plan anyway. >> >> >> >> >> On August 11, 2015 at 10:39:25 PM, Cameron McKenzie ( >> mckenzie....@gmail.com) wrote: >> >> My git knowledge is not deep enough to work out what's going on with the >> CURATOR-3.0 branch, so I'm happy to go from scratch. Is it just a matter >> of >> branching off master and merging all of the CURATOR-3.0 related branches? >> >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Jordan Zimmerman < >> jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote: >> >> > We need to come to a decision on the CURATOR-3.0 branch. My gut instinct >> > is to start from scratch. Any other ideas? >> > >> > -JZ >> > >> > >> > >> > On August 11, 2015 at 5:28:30 PM, Cameron McKenzie ( >> mckenzie....@gmail.com) >> > wrote: >> > >> > Also, which branch should the CURATOR-214 fix come off? From memory the >> > CURATOR-3.0 branch was broken in some capacity. Should I be branching >> off >> > CURATOR-3.0-temp or something else? >> > cheers >> > >> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Cameron McKenzie < >> mckenzie....@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > Will do. In the meantime could you please have a look at my suggested >> > solution for CURATOR-228 (It's in the JIRA)? I don't want to start work >> on >> > it until we have an agreed solution. >> > cheers >> > >> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Jordan Zimmerman < >> > jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote: >> > Hi Cameron, >> > >> > Go ahead and do CURATOR-214 - I assigned it to you. >> > >> > -JZ >> > >> > >> > >> > On August 9, 2015 at 6:47:50 PM, Cameron McKenzie ( >> mckenzie....@gmail.com) >> > wrote: >> > >> > Sounds reasonable, what's left for 3.0.0? >> > >> > I think that watcher removal is done. So just the host provider ( >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-213) and new create APIs >> ( >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-214). >> > >> > I'm happy to pick up the new create APIs if no one else is looking at >> it. >> > cheers >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Jordan Zimmerman < >> > jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote: >> > On August 9, 2015 at 5:15:36 PM, Cameron McKenzie ( >> mckenzie....@gmail.com) >> > wrote: >> > As for Curator 3.0.0, any ideas when ZK 3.5.x is mean to get out of >> Alpha? >> > I've seen some grumblings on the ZK mailing list, but nothing concrete. >> I >> > guess we just need to be ready for that date whenever it is. >> > cheers >> > Cam >> > Who knows :) But, I know people are using it in Production so I think we >> > should just treat it as released software. >> > >> > >> > >> > -JZ >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> >
