So, I will delete the existing CURATOR-3.0 branch? On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Cameron McKenzie <mckenzie....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sure thing. > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Jordan Zimmerman < > jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote: > >> Go ahead, if you don’t mind. >> >> >> >> On August 11, 2015 at 10:50:52 PM, Cameron McKenzie ( >> mckenzie....@gmail.com) wrote: >> >> Ok, I can give that a spin if you like, or I'm happy for you to do it and >> I'll branch from there for CURATOR-214. >> >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Jordan Zimmerman < >> jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote: >> >>> Is it just a matter of >>> branching off master and merging all of the CURATOR-3.0 related >>> branches? >>> >>> Yes, that’s my plan anyway. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On August 11, 2015 at 10:39:25 PM, Cameron McKenzie ( >>> mckenzie....@gmail.com) wrote: >>> >>> My git knowledge is not deep enough to work out what's going on with the >>> CURATOR-3.0 branch, so I'm happy to go from scratch. Is it just a matter >>> of >>> branching off master and merging all of the CURATOR-3.0 related branches? >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Jordan Zimmerman < >>> jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote: >>> >>> > We need to come to a decision on the CURATOR-3.0 branch. My gut >>> instinct >>> > is to start from scratch. Any other ideas? >>> > >>> > -JZ >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On August 11, 2015 at 5:28:30 PM, Cameron McKenzie ( >>> mckenzie....@gmail.com) >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > Also, which branch should the CURATOR-214 fix come off? From memory the >>> > CURATOR-3.0 branch was broken in some capacity. Should I be branching >>> off >>> > CURATOR-3.0-temp or something else? >>> > cheers >>> > >>> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Cameron McKenzie < >>> mckenzie....@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> > Will do. In the meantime could you please have a look at my suggested >>> > solution for CURATOR-228 (It's in the JIRA)? I don't want to start >>> work on >>> > it until we have an agreed solution. >>> > cheers >>> > >>> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Jordan Zimmerman < >>> > jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote: >>> > Hi Cameron, >>> > >>> > Go ahead and do CURATOR-214 - I assigned it to you. >>> > >>> > -JZ >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On August 9, 2015 at 6:47:50 PM, Cameron McKenzie ( >>> mckenzie....@gmail.com) >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > Sounds reasonable, what's left for 3.0.0? >>> > >>> > I think that watcher removal is done. So just the host provider ( >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-213) and new create >>> APIs ( >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-214). >>> > >>> > I'm happy to pick up the new create APIs if no one else is looking at >>> it. >>> > cheers >>> > >>> > >>> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Jordan Zimmerman < >>> > jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote: >>> > On August 9, 2015 at 5:15:36 PM, Cameron McKenzie ( >>> mckenzie....@gmail.com) >>> > wrote: >>> > As for Curator 3.0.0, any ideas when ZK 3.5.x is mean to get out of >>> Alpha? >>> > I've seen some grumblings on the ZK mailing list, but nothing >>> concrete. I >>> > guess we just need to be ready for that date whenever it is. >>> > cheers >>> > Cam >>> > Who knows :) But, I know people are using it in Production so I think >>> we >>> > should just treat it as released software. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -JZ >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >> >
