+1 for it.
BTW,
Camel-CXF doesn't have the direct dependency of JBI transport.
On 6/13/11 7:15 PM, Freeman Fang wrote:
+1
I'll remove the JBI stuff from CXF and add these in Servicemix component.
Freeman
On 2011-6-10, at 下午8:57, Daniel Kulp wrote:
I want to start a discussion about removing the JBI related modules on
trunk.
There is the JBI binding, JBI transport, and the JBI integration
module that,
IMO, could be removed.
Basically, if you are using CXF in JBI, you are most likely using the CXF
BC/SE components from ServiceMix, not the stuff we provide directly.
Really,
I think the only consumers of this stuff are the BC/SE. Thus, I'd propose
this code gets removed from CXF and whatever is needed by the BC/SE
just gets
pushed into those components in SMX. Keep all the JBI related stuff
there.
Thoughts? Opinions?
--
Daniel Kulp
[email protected]
http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend - http://www.talend.com
---------------------------------------------
Freeman Fang
FuseSource
Email:[email protected]
Web: fusesource.com
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
--
Willem
----------------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://www.fusesource.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: willemjiang
