+1 Cheers, Sergey
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Willem Jiang <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for it. > > BTW, > Camel-CXF doesn't have the direct dependency of JBI transport. > > On 6/13/11 7:15 PM, Freeman Fang wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> I'll remove the JBI stuff from CXF and add these in Servicemix component. >> >> Freeman >> On 2011-6-10, at 下午8:57, Daniel Kulp wrote: >> >>> >>> I want to start a discussion about removing the JBI related modules on >>> trunk. >>> There is the JBI binding, JBI transport, and the JBI integration >>> module that, >>> IMO, could be removed. >>> >>> Basically, if you are using CXF in JBI, you are most likely using the CXF >>> BC/SE components from ServiceMix, not the stuff we provide directly. >>> Really, >>> I think the only consumers of this stuff are the BC/SE. Thus, I'd propose >>> this code gets removed from CXF and whatever is needed by the BC/SE >>> just gets >>> pushed into those components in SMX. Keep all the JBI related stuff >>> there. >>> >>> Thoughts? Opinions? >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel Kulp >>> [email protected] >>> http://dankulp.com/blog >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> >> --------------------------------------------- >> Freeman Fang >> >> FuseSource >> Email:[email protected] >> Web: fusesource.com >> Twitter: freemanfang >> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Willem > ---------------------------------- > FuseSource > Web: http://www.fusesource.com > Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) > http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese) > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: willemjiang > -- Sergey Beryozkin Application Integration Division of Talend http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com
