On 2017-11-16 07:27, Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote: > I dont think we can already predict when users move to Java 9. > So creating a Java 9 only branch at this time means we have to maintain two > main branches over a long time. > > What is the rationale behind a Java 9 only branch compared to being Java 9 > and Java 8 compatible on master?
I also don't see a good reason to do that at the moment. Let's release the XJC plugin and users should be able to use CXF with Java 9 or am I missing something? Cheers Dennis
