Hey guys,

I have only these 3 issues to wrap up [1], [2], [3], for all of them
pull requests are opened, waiting for minor changes / confirmations fixes work. 
@Dan @Colm appreciate your input on [4] please, this is to eliminate the 
leak of the REMOVED_MARKER. Thanks!
 
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8798
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8799  
[3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8796
[4] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1033 
 
Best Regards,
    Andriy Redko
 
> I'm done now in terms of any remaining fixes for the next
> releases...not sure if @Andriy Redko has anything else planned?

> Colm.

> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:48 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh
> <cohei...@apache.org> wrote:
>> It works for me as well. I'm coordinating with @Andriy Redko  on two
>> fixes that remain for 3.5.x/3.4.x and then we should be good to go.
>> Colm.
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:10 AM Jim Ma <mail2ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks Andriy and Dan !
>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 10:28 PM Andrey Redko <drr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Works for me, thanks a lot Dan!

>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>     Andriy Redko
>>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022, 8:45 AM Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> I don't think anything blocking is left, +1 to move forward! @Colm @Dan

>>>>> do
>>>>>> we want to drop 4.0.0 only or make 3.4.x / 3.5.x releases as well? With
>>>>>> 4.0.0 out and 3.6.0 getting ready to be out soon (hopefully), the 3.4.x
>>>>> is
>>>>>> approaching EOL quickly, could be the last release.
>>>>> I was definitely planning on doing 3.4/3.5 releases sometime before the
>>>>> end of the year.  Thus, we could do a full set of releases.   I have a
>>>>> bunch of things happening this week, but would next Monday work for
>>>>> everyone?  That would give a week to get any final updates in.
>>>>> Dan
>>>>>> Thank you guys!
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>    Andriy Redko
>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2022, 10:27 PM Jim Ma <mail2ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Andriy,
>>>>>>> Can we start the release work if there isn't the major thing left we
>>>>> need
>>>>>>> to include in CXF 4.0.0 release ?

>>>>>>> @Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> Can you please help do the release
>>>> when
>>>>>>> it's convenient for you?

>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Jim
>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 1:18 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net
>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>> +1 to release 4.0.0 even partial release.

>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 9:19 AM Jim Ma <mail2ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>> After 9 months of work, we finally fixed/worked around all issues
>>>> for
>>>>>>>>> Jakarta support. Now all the cxf tests are passed:
>>>>>>>>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK17/848/ and we can
>>>>> say
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> CXF successfully migrated to Jakarta namespace(and support Jakarta

>>>>>>>> EE9.1).
>>>>>>>>> To get cxf jakarta artifacts/binary available for the CXF community
>>>>>>>>> especially the user who asked for this jakarta artifacts like [1]
>>>> and
>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>> more feedback from our community, do you think it's time to release
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> CXF
>>>>>>>>> 4.0.0 and what else do you think we should have in this new jakarta

>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>> [1]https://lists.apache.org/thread/kwfg2s5gj72tkgn5c5vdcsvtgdkdm6dl
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Jim
>>>>> --
>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>> dk...@apache.org <mailto:dk...@apache.org>
>>>>> Talend - https://talend.com <https://talend.com/>

Reply via email to