Hi Andriy, Thanks for the quick update. Good to see this is running with the jenkins pipeline and all tests are green. Did it include all things for the CXF 4.0.0 release ?
Thanks, Jim On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 10:06 AM Andriy Redko <drr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jim, > > I disabled this build (and > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK19/ as well) > because we run pipeline matrix [1] against both JDKs. These builds were > quite useful when > the main branch was unstable, but the pipeline should be sufficient now. > Please let me > know if you have any concerns, thank you. > > [1] https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/pipeline/job/main/ > > Best Regards, > Andriy Redko > > JM> Did we already start the 4.0 release work ? > JM> I saw the CI build for CXF 4.0.0 is disabled now : > JM> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK17/ and last build > result > JM> was 7 days ago. > > > > > JM> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 8:46 PM Andriy Redko <drr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Hi Colm, > >> > >> I still wait for review on [1], if you or/and Dan could take a look, > >> would be great. The [2] could go in today but no user response on [3], > >> may need a bump to next version. Thank you. > >> > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1033 > >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8799 > >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8798 > >> > >> Best Regards, > >> Andriy Redko > >> > >> COh> Hi Andriy, > >> > >> COh> What's the status of these open issues? Can they be merged today or > >> COh> else bumped to the next release? > >> > >> COh> Colm. > >> > >> COh> On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 6:17 PM Andriy Redko <drr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Hey guys, > >> >> > >> >> I have only these 3 issues to wrap up [1], [2], [3], for all of them > >> >> pull requests are opened, waiting for minor changes / confirmations > >> fixes work. > >> >> @Dan @Colm appreciate your input on [4] please, this is to eliminate > the > >> >> leak of the REMOVED_MARKER. Thanks! > >> >> > >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8798 > >> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8799 > >> >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8796 > >> >> [4] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1033 > >> >> > >> >> Best Regards, > >> >> Andriy Redko > >> >> > >> >> > I'm done now in terms of any remaining fixes for the next > >> >> > releases...not sure if @Andriy Redko has anything else planned? > >> >> > >> >> > Colm. > >> >> > >> >> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:48 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh > >> >> > <cohei...@apache.org> wrote: > >> >> >> It works for me as well. I'm coordinating with @Andriy Redko on > two > >> >> >> fixes that remain for 3.5.x/3.4.x and then we should be good to > go. > >> >> >> Colm. > >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:10 AM Jim Ma <mail2ji...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> >> >>> Thanks Andriy and Dan ! > >> >> >>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 10:28 PM Andrey Redko <drr...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> >> >>>> Works for me, thanks a lot Dan! > >> >> > >> >> >>>> Best Regards, > >> >> >>>> Andriy Redko > >> >> >>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022, 8:45 AM Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>> I don't think anything blocking is left, +1 to move forward! > >> @Colm @Dan > >> >> > >> >> >>>>> do > >> >> >>>>>> we want to drop 4.0.0 only or make 3.4.x / 3.5.x releases as > >> well? With > >> >> >>>>>> 4.0.0 out and 3.6.0 getting ready to be out soon (hopefully), > >> the 3.4.x > >> >> >>>>> is > >> >> >>>>>> approaching EOL quickly, could be the last release. > >> >> >>>>> I was definitely planning on doing 3.4/3.5 releases sometime > >> before the > >> >> >>>>> end of the year. Thus, we could do a full set of releases. I > >> have a > >> >> >>>>> bunch of things happening this week, but would next Monday work > >> for > >> >> >>>>> everyone? That would give a week to get any final updates in. > >> >> >>>>> Dan > >> >> >>>>>> Thank you guys! > >> >> >>>>>> Best Regards, > >> >> >>>>>> Andriy Redko > >> >> >>>>>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2022, 10:27 PM Jim Ma <mail2ji...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>> Hi Andriy, > >> >> >>>>>>> Can we start the release work if there isn't the major thing > >> left we > >> >> >>>>> need > >> >> >>>>>>> to include in CXF 4.0.0 release ? > >> >> > >> >> >>>>>>> @Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> Can you please help do the > >> release > >> >> >>>> when > >> >> >>>>>>> it's convenient for you? > >> >> > >> >> >>>>>>> Thanks, > >> >> >>>>>>> Jim > >> >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 1:18 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > >> j...@nanthrax.net > >> >> >>>>>>> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >>>>>>>> +1 to release 4.0.0 even partial release. > >> >> > >> >> >>>>>>>> Regards > >> >> >>>>>>>> JB > >> >> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 9:19 AM Jim Ma <mail2ji...@gmail.com > > > >> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Hi all, > >> >> >>>>>>>>> After 9 months of work, we finally fixed/worked around all > >> issues > >> >> >>>> for > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Jakarta support. Now all the cxf tests are passed: > >> >> >>>>>>>>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK17/848/ > and > >> we can > >> >> >>>>> say > >> >> >>>>>>>> that > >> >> >>>>>>>>> CXF successfully migrated to Jakarta namespace(and support > >> Jakarta > >> >> > >> >> >>>>>>>> EE9.1). > >> >> >>>>>>>>> To get cxf jakarta artifacts/binary available for the CXF > >> community > >> >> >>>>>>>>> especially the user who asked for this jakarta artifacts > like > >> [1] > >> >> >>>> and > >> >> >>>>>>>> get > >> >> >>>>>>>>> more feedback from our community, do you think it's time to > >> release > >> >> >>>>> the > >> >> >>>>>>>> CXF > >> >> >>>>>>>>> 4.0.0 and what else do you think we should have in this new > >> jakarta > >> >> > >> >> >>>>>>>> release > >> >> >>>>>>>>> ? > >> >> >>>>>>>>> [1] > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/kwfg2s5gj72tkgn5c5vdcsvtgdkdm6dl > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Jim > >> >> >>>>> -- > >> >> >>>>> Daniel Kulp > >> >> >>>>> dk...@apache.org <mailto:dk...@apache.org> > >> >> >>>>> Talend - https://talend.com <https://talend.com/> > >> >> > >> > >> > >
