> Yes, as Jim mentioned, most of our tests need JDK-17 to run (because of > Spring 6), > we also need JDK-17 to compile (same reason), but when Spring is not involved > (it is > optional by and large), JDK-11 is sufficient. We do have a number of samples > (bundled > with distribution) that run on JDK-11 with no issues. Please let me know your > conclusions > and if you need any help or pointers here. Thank you.
Found a minor class loader issue in cxf-core which fixed a couple of things related to using spring5. (Non-servlet spring 5) I’ll get that committed shortly once test run. That said, has anyone actually gone through the samples and actually made sure they work? They compile OK (with java17), but many don’t actually work. None of the JMS samples seem to work at all. Some are still setup to use activemq (might be OK, but the class path doesn’t have activemq) and others that are setup for Artemis don’t have proper spring bean configuration for it and the connection factories cannot be created. I’ve only tested a few samples, but so far I’m seeing a bunch of issues. Dan > > Best Regards, > Andriy Redko > > DK> On Dec 11, 2022, at 9:36 PM, Jim Ma <mail2ji...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Andriy, >>> Thanks for the quick update. Good to see this is running with the jenkins >>> pipeline and all tests are green. >>> Did it include all things for the CXF 4.0.0 release ? > > DK> I didn’t do the 4.0.0 release as I kind of ran out of time. My basic > tests don’t work with java11, but I didn’t really get time to figure out why > yet. I’m trying to figure out if it’s still actually compatible with java11 > or not. If not, we should bump the jdk.version up. > > > DK> Dan > > >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jim >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 10:06 AM Andriy Redko <drr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Jim, >>>> >>>> I disabled this build (and >>>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK19/ as well) >>>> because we run pipeline matrix [1] against both JDKs. These builds were >>>> quite useful when >>>> the main branch was unstable, but the pipeline should be sufficient now. >>>> Please let me >>>> know if you have any concerns, thank you. >>>> >>>> [1] https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/pipeline/job/main/ >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> Andriy Redko >>>> >>>> JM> Did we already start the 4.0 release work ? >>>> JM> I saw the CI build for CXF 4.0.0 is disabled now : >>>> JM> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK17/ and last build >>>> result >>>> JM> was 7 days ago. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> JM> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 8:46 PM Andriy Redko <drr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Hi Colm, >>>>>> >>>>>> I still wait for review on [1], if you or/and Dan could take a look, >>>>>> would be great. The [2] could go in today but no user response on [3], >>>>>> may need a bump to next version. Thank you. >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1033 >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8799 >>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8798 >>>>>> >>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>> Andriy Redko >>>>>> >>>>>> COh> Hi Andriy, >>>>>> >>>>>> COh> What's the status of these open issues? Can they be merged today or >>>>>> COh> else bumped to the next release? >>>>>> >>>>>> COh> Colm. >>>>>> >>>>>> COh> On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 6:17 PM Andriy Redko <drr...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hey guys, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have only these 3 issues to wrap up [1], [2], [3], for all of them >>>>>>>> pull requests are opened, waiting for minor changes / confirmations >>>>>> fixes work. >>>>>>>> @Dan @Colm appreciate your input on [4] please, this is to eliminate >>>> the >>>>>>>> leak of the REMOVED_MARKER. Thanks! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8798 >>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8799 >>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8796 >>>>>>>> [4] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1033 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>> Andriy Redko >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm done now in terms of any remaining fixes for the next >>>>>>>>> releases...not sure if @Andriy Redko has anything else planned? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Colm. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:48 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh >>>>>>>>> <cohei...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> It works for me as well. I'm coordinating with @Andriy Redko on >>>> two >>>>>>>>>> fixes that remain for 3.5.x/3.4.x and then we should be good to >>>> go. >>>>>>>>>> Colm. >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:10 AM Jim Ma <mail2ji...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Andriy and Dan ! >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 10:28 PM Andrey Redko <drr...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Works for me, thanks a lot Dan! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> Andriy Redko >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022, 8:45 AM Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think anything blocking is left, +1 to move forward! >>>>>> @Colm @Dan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> do >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we want to drop 4.0.0 only or make 3.4.x / 3.5.x releases as >>>>>> well? With >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4.0.0 out and 3.6.0 getting ready to be out soon (hopefully), >>>>>> the 3.4.x >>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching EOL quickly, could be the last release. >>>>>>>>>>>>> I was definitely planning on doing 3.4/3.5 releases sometime >>>>>> before the >>>>>>>>>>>>> end of the year. Thus, we could do a full set of releases. I >>>>>> have a >>>>>>>>>>>>> bunch of things happening this week, but would next Monday work >>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>> everyone? That would give a week to get any final updates in. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Dan >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you guys! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andriy Redko >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2022, 10:27 PM Jim Ma <mail2ji...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Andriy, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we start the release work if there isn't the major thing >>>>>> left we >>>>>>>>>>>>> need >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to include in CXF 4.0.0 release ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> Can you please help do the >>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's convenient for you? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 1:18 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to release 4.0.0 even partial release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 9:19 AM Jim Ma <mail2ji...@gmail.com >>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After 9 months of work, we finally fixed/worked around all >>>>>> issues >>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jakarta support. Now all the cxf tests are passed: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK17/848/ >>>> and >>>>>> we can >>>>>>>>>>>>> say >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CXF successfully migrated to Jakarta namespace(and support >>>>>> Jakarta >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EE9.1). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To get cxf jakarta artifacts/binary available for the CXF >>>>>> community >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> especially the user who asked for this jakarta artifacts >>>> like >>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more feedback from our community, do you think it's time to >>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CXF >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4.0.0 and what else do you think we should have in this new >>>>>> jakarta >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/kwfg2s5gj72tkgn5c5vdcsvtgdkdm6dl >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jim >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel Kulp >>>>>>>>>>>>> dk...@apache.org <mailto:dk...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Talend - https://talend.com <https://talend.com/> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> > -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org <mailto:dk...@apache.org> Talend - https://talend.com <https://talend.com/>
