Thanks for the update, Dan. Are these basic tests failed because Spring6 is built with java17 and it isn't compatible with java11 anymore ?
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 11:01 AM Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Dec 11, 2022, at 9:36 PM, Jim Ma <mail2ji...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Andriy, > > Thanks for the quick update. Good to see this is running with the jenkins > > pipeline and all tests are green. > > Did it include all things for the CXF 4.0.0 release ? > > I didn’t do the 4.0.0 release as I kind of ran out of time. My basic > tests don’t work with java11, but I didn’t really get time to figure out > why yet. I’m trying to figure out if it’s still actually compatible with > java11 or not. If not, we should bump the jdk.version up. > > > Dan > > > > > > Thanks, > > Jim > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 10:06 AM Andriy Redko <drr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi Jim, > >> > >> I disabled this build (and > >> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK19/ as well) > >> because we run pipeline matrix [1] against both JDKs. These builds were > >> quite useful when > >> the main branch was unstable, but the pipeline should be sufficient > now. > >> Please let me > >> know if you have any concerns, thank you. > >> > >> [1] https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/pipeline/job/main/ > >> > >> Best Regards, > >> Andriy Redko > >> > >> JM> Did we already start the 4.0 release work ? > >> JM> I saw the CI build for CXF 4.0.0 is disabled now : > >> JM> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK17/ and last build > >> result > >> JM> was 7 days ago. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> JM> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 8:46 PM Andriy Redko <drr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >>>> Hi Colm, > >>>> > >>>> I still wait for review on [1], if you or/and Dan could take a look, > >>>> would be great. The [2] could go in today but no user response on [3], > >>>> may need a bump to next version. Thank you. > >>>> > >>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1033 > >>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8799 > >>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8798 > >>>> > >>>> Best Regards, > >>>> Andriy Redko > >>>> > >>>> COh> Hi Andriy, > >>>> > >>>> COh> What's the status of these open issues? Can they be merged today > or > >>>> COh> else bumped to the next release? > >>>> > >>>> COh> Colm. > >>>> > >>>> COh> On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 6:17 PM Andriy Redko <drr...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hey guys, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I have only these 3 issues to wrap up [1], [2], [3], for all of them > >>>>>> pull requests are opened, waiting for minor changes / confirmations > >>>> fixes work. > >>>>>> @Dan @Colm appreciate your input on [4] please, this is to eliminate > >> the > >>>>>> leak of the REMOVED_MARKER. Thanks! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8798 > >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8799 > >>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8796 > >>>>>> [4] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1033 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Best Regards, > >>>>>> Andriy Redko > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'm done now in terms of any remaining fixes for the next > >>>>>>> releases...not sure if @Andriy Redko has anything else planned? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Colm. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:48 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh > >>>>>>> <cohei...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>> It works for me as well. I'm coordinating with @Andriy Redko on > >> two > >>>>>>>> fixes that remain for 3.5.x/3.4.x and then we should be good to > >> go. > >>>>>>>> Colm. > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:10 AM Jim Ma <mail2ji...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Thanks Andriy and Dan ! > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 10:28 PM Andrey Redko <drr...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> Works for me, thanks a lot Dan! > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > >>>>>>>>>> Andriy Redko > >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022, 8:45 AM Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think anything blocking is left, +1 to move forward! > >>>> @Colm @Dan > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> do > >>>>>>>>>>>> we want to drop 4.0.0 only or make 3.4.x / 3.5.x releases as > >>>> well? With > >>>>>>>>>>>> 4.0.0 out and 3.6.0 getting ready to be out soon (hopefully), > >>>> the 3.4.x > >>>>>>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>>>>> approaching EOL quickly, could be the last release. > >>>>>>>>>>> I was definitely planning on doing 3.4/3.5 releases sometime > >>>> before the > >>>>>>>>>>> end of the year. Thus, we could do a full set of releases. I > >>>> have a > >>>>>>>>>>> bunch of things happening this week, but would next Monday work > >>>> for > >>>>>>>>>>> everyone? That would give a week to get any final updates in. > >>>>>>>>>>> Dan > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you guys! > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Andriy Redko > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2022, 10:27 PM Jim Ma <mail2ji...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Andriy, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we start the release work if there isn't the major thing > >>>> left we > >>>>>>>>>>> need > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to include in CXF 4.0.0 release ? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> @Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> Can you please help do the > >>>> release > >>>>>>>>>> when > >>>>>>>>>>>>> it's convenient for you? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jim > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 1:18 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > >>>> j...@nanthrax.net > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to release 4.0.0 even partial release. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> JB > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 9:19 AM Jim Ma <mail2ji...@gmail.com > >>> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After 9 months of work, we finally fixed/worked around all > >>>> issues > >>>>>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jakarta support. Now all the cxf tests are passed: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK17/848/ > >> and > >>>> we can > >>>>>>>>>>> say > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CXF successfully migrated to Jakarta namespace(and support > >>>> Jakarta > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> EE9.1). > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To get cxf jakarta artifacts/binary available for the CXF > >>>> community > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> especially the user who asked for this jakarta artifacts > >> like > >>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> get > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more feedback from our community, do you think it's time to > >>>> release > >>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CXF > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4.0.0 and what else do you think we should have in this new > >>>> jakarta > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/kwfg2s5gj72tkgn5c5vdcsvtgdkdm6dl > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jim > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>> Daniel Kulp > >>>>>>>>>>> dk...@apache.org <mailto:dk...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>>>> Talend - https://talend.com <https://talend.com/> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > > -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org <mailto:dk...@apache.org> > Talend - https://talend.com <https://talend.com/> > >
