stevedlawrence commented on a change in pull request #273: WIP: Add User Defined Functions Capability URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-daffodil/pull/273#discussion_r331682771
########## File path: daffodil-core/src/main/scala/org/apache/daffodil/dpath/Expression.scala ########## @@ -1870,6 +1871,47 @@ case class FunctionCallExpression(functionQNameString: String, expressions: List case (RefQName(_, "unsignedByte", XSD), args) => XSConverterExpr(functionQNameString, functionQName, args, NodeInfo.UnsignedByte) + case (RefQName(Some(_), _, _), args) => { + val namespace = functionQName.namespace.toString() + val fName = functionQName.local + + lazy val udfservice = { + val a = UDFService + a.warnings.map { w => SDW(WarnID.UserDefinedFunction, w) } + val allErrors = a.errors.mkString("\n\n") + SDE(s"Function unknown: fname[${fName}] fnamespace[${namespace}].\n$allErrors") + a + } + + val fcObject = udfservice.udfs.lookupFunctionClass(namespace, fName) + + if (fcObject == null) { + SDE("Function not found: fname[%s] fnamespace[%s]. Currently registered UDFs:\n%s", fName, namespace, udfservice.allFunctionClasses) + } + + val fcClassType = fcObject.getClass + + val paramTypesReturnTypeTuple: Array[(Array[Class[_]], Class[_])] = fcClassType.getMethods.collect { + case p if p.getName == "evaluate" => (p.getParameterTypes, p.getReturnType) + } + + if (paramTypesReturnTypeTuple.isEmpty) { + SDE("Missing evaluate method for function provided: name[%s] namespace[%s]", fName, namespace) + } + + if (paramTypesReturnTypeTuple.length > 1) { + SDE("Only one evaluate method allowed per function class: name[%s] namespace[%s]", fName, namespace) + } + + val paramTypes: Array[Class[_]] = paramTypesReturnTypeTuple.head._1 + val retType: Class[_] = paramTypesReturnTypeTuple.head._2 + + val evaluateParamTypes: List[NodeInfo.Kind] = paramTypes.map { c => NodeInfo.fromClassTypeName(c.getTypeName) }.toList + val evaluateReturnType = NodeInfo.fromClassTypeName(retType.getTypeName) + + UDFunctionCallExpr(functionQNameString, functionQName, args, evaluateParamTypes, evaluateReturnType, UDFunctionCall(_, fcObject)) + } + case _ => SDE("Unsupported function: %s", functionQName) Review comment: I think we should just require UDF's to be called with a namespace but not necessarily require a prefix. For example, we could have something like this:: ```xsd <xs:schema xmlns="http://foo.com" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchem"> <xs:element name="foo" dfdl:inputValueCalc="{ myfunc() }" /> </xs:schema> ``` In this example, we define the default namespace using ``xmlns=``, so anything without a prefix will be in that namespace. Since ``myfunc()`` is not prefixed it will be in the ``http://foo.com`` namespace. Note that the functions we normally see are either in the ``dfdl`` or ``fn`` namespace. And since it never really makes sense to set the default namespace to one of these the prefix is always needed. But schemas can be designed so the prefix isn't required. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services