+1 have thought we've been ready for months On Monday, August 15, 2016, Matthew Hayes <matthew.terence.ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 from me as well. I reviewed the checklist and I think we satisfy almost > all of the items listed there. > > I'd also like to share some data about the DataFu releases and community > that I gathered, which might be useful documentation. > > Releases: > > 1.3.0 (2015-11-14) > There were two release candidates, RC0 and RC1. The release candidates > were made available as source code. During PPMC voting there was a minor > bug found in a new UDF in RC0. RC1 passed the podling dev list vote as > well as the general incubator list vote. Feedback provided during the > general vote was captured in JIRAs for the next release. Binaries were > released later in the Apache maven repo. > > 1.3.1 (2016-08-09) > There was one release candidates, RC1. The release candidate was provided > as source code. Binaries were also provided for convenience in the Apache > maven repo. An earlier release candidate, RC0, was not voted on (I > realized I signed with a non-Apache email and created a new RC for > simplicity). This release addressed all the feedback from 1.3.0. RC1 > passed both the dev list and general list votes. There was minor feedback, > such as updating the copyright year range in the website, which was > subsequently fixed with the website refresh corresponding to the release. > > Community: > > The project began with 10 committers. Since joining incubator, another 4 > committers have been added, bringing the total number of committers to 14. > DataFu has also received contributions from 7 other people in addition to > those from committers. > > -Matt > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Sam Shah <shah...@umich.edu > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > +1, I think we've checked most of the boxes necessary: the project and > the > > community is mature enough for graduation. > > > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > looking at the awesome progress of the past couple of > > > weeks with a 1.3.1 release out I'd like to put my mentor > > > hat on and suggest that perhaps this community is > > > actually ready to graduate. > > > > > > Now, it is true, that Datafu is a small community, but > > > so was Celix when it graduated and it seems to be > > > doing fine at ASF. It is OK to be small, you just have > > > to be viable and I really think this community is. > > > > > > With that in mind, I'd like to open this for discussion. > > > Lets hear what do others think. > > > > > > Now, personally, I find it useful to think about how ready > > > a project is to graduation while evaluating it against this > > > model: > > > https://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project- > > > maturity-model.html > > > > > > Of course, I'm not suggesting that this is a must-follow > > > checklist, rather just advising to keep it in mind when > > > you for your opinion on whether Datafu is ready to leave > > > the nest ;-) > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Roman. > > > > > > -- Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com relato.io
