I'll look into DATAFU-121 and releasing it in 1.3.2. -Matt
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:15 AM, Justin Mclean > <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > >> I don't understand this comment. Was there a typo? The 1.3.1 release > >> included both the binaries and sources. > > > > I would suggest making one more release and have both the source and > binary reviews > > by the incubator. But lets wait to see what your mentors think as they > have a better idea > > than me re project progress. > > It would be great to see 1.3.2 that is nothing else but fix for: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DATAFU-121 > > > > >> Can you explain more what you mean by this? I don't understand. There > is > >> a single source release [3] that can generate binaries [1] and [2]. > > > > The source packages there at [1] and [2] is not the source package that > was voted on (it may be a subset?) that seems like a concern. > > To me those are part of the binary vote (see Matthew's explanation bellow). > > I checked and it looks like they are not publishing official .tar.gz as par > of the Maven push -- which is perfectly fine. > > Thanks, > Roman. >
