> > I think you should one release with both the binaries and sources before > graduation
I don't understand this comment. Was there a typo? The 1.3.1 release included both the binaries and sources. It not immediately obvious to me that the two binaries you have (hourglass > and pig) relate directly to the source release. Can you explain more what you mean by this? I don't understand. There is a single source release [3] that can generate binaries [1] and [2]. -Matt On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:02 AM, Justin Mclean <[email protected]> wrote: > HI, > > > At the time of the 1.3.0 source release I wasn't prepared to release the > > binaries because I hadn't read enough about the process to do it right. > > IMO I think you should one release with both the binaries and sources > before graduation, but other may have differing opinions. > > It not immediately obvious to me that the two binaries you have (hourglass > and pig) relate directly to the source release. I can see that both of them > also have a source jar inside them [1][2] but each source jar is different > and possibly different to [3]? That might be considered an unapproved > source release? > > Branding wise your site is missing a few things, including a download > section, required links and the like [4] but that should be easily fixed. > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/public/org/ > apache/datafu/datafu-pig-incubating/1.3.1/ > 2. https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/public/org/ > apache/datafu/datafu-hourglass-incubating/1.3.1/ > 3. http://apache.mirror.amaze.com.au/incubator/datafu/ > apache-datafu-incubating-1.3.1/ > 4. http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html
