Am Mittwoch, den 29.08.2007, 16:16 -0500 schrieb Barbara Duprey: > Yes, I really, really want to go to 2.3, but the site is still offering > 2.2.1 as the latest stable release and I'm not sure a development build > is what I want. So I seem to have these choices: stick with 2.0.4 until > 2.3 comes out and then upgrade; upgrade to 2.2.1 and then to 2.3 in a > few(?) days; upgrade to the latest 2.3 development build and then to 2.3 > when it's stable. Are you saying that the latest 2.3 development build > really is stable enough for production work? If so, I'll gladly go to > it. I'm on WinXP, us-en, so the more arcane aspects of locale and so on > don't really affect me.
Don't be shy, upgrading on a windows machine is pretty easy and fast. I did it while watching TV last time. ;) The only thing I'm not really sure about is which version replaces the installed one and which is installing itself side by side. I think the readme will tell or there are some command line switches. At least the 2.3.0-dev version installed itself in parallel to an existing 2.2.0 release by default. Marc --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
