-0.5 (instead of -1), because i used "value" in codi back then and there is nothing wrong with it. however, that was one of the lessons learned from using it in projects and explaining it in trainings for almost three years. what we have right now just reflects the feedback.
regards, gerhard 2013/10/3 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > If config is the unique mandatory attr it should be value imo > Le 3 oct. 2013 22:39, "Gerhard Petracek" <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > > > hi thomas, > > > > yes - we had something in codi and we might add something like the > payload > > in bv. > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > > > > > 2013/10/3 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> > > > > > @Gerhard: Are there any expected properties on @ViewRef in the future? > > > > > > > > > 2013/10/3 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > +1, same for @ConfigProperty btw > > > > Le 3 oct. 2013 20:49, "Gerhard Petracek" <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com > > > > a > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > -0.5 for now > > > > > once we add more, you get the same and it would be not that > > expressive. > > > > > that was the reason for changing it (compared to codi). > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > gerhard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/10/3 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > currently @ViewRef has only one property called "config". > > > > > > > > > > > > So the current usage is: > > > > > > @ViewRef(config = Views.Logout.class) > > > > > > > > > > > > What about renaming it to "value"? > > > > > > -> @ViewRef(Views.Logout.class) > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Thomas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
