I didnt use viewref enough to say but typically it is boring to need to write name in configproperty each time while you know what it is. Moreover for viewref, config doesnt sound really right, metadata or marker sounds as right as config depending where you are coming from.
Well this doesnt hold features so i dont want to loose time in it but now you know why i like value ;) Le 3 oct. 2013 23:21, "Gerhard Petracek" <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> a écrit : > -0.5 (instead of -1), because i used "value" in codi back then and there is > nothing wrong with it. > however, that was one of the lessons learned from using it in projects and > explaining it in trainings for almost three years. > what we have right now just reflects the feedback. > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2013/10/3 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > > If config is the unique mandatory attr it should be value imo > > Le 3 oct. 2013 22:39, "Gerhard Petracek" <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> a > > écrit : > > > > > hi thomas, > > > > > > yes - we had something in codi and we might add something like the > > payload > > > in bv. > > > > > > regards, > > > gerhard > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/10/3 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > @Gerhard: Are there any expected properties on @ViewRef in the > future? > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/10/3 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > +1, same for @ConfigProperty btw > > > > > Le 3 oct. 2013 20:49, "Gerhard Petracek" < > gerhard.petra...@gmail.com > > > > > > a > > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > -0.5 for now > > > > > > once we add more, you get the same and it would be not that > > > expressive. > > > > > > that was the reason for changing it (compared to codi). > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > gerhard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/10/3 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > currently @ViewRef has only one property called "config". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So the current usage is: > > > > > > > @ViewRef(config = Views.Logout.class) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What about renaming it to "value"? > > > > > > > -> @ViewRef(Views.Logout.class) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Thomas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
