More opinions about this?
2013/10/7 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> > +1 Romain > > IMO it's "nicer" to read but it's not up to me. > > > 2013/10/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > >> I didnt use viewref enough to say but typically it is boring to need to >> write name in configproperty each time while you know what it is. Moreover >> for viewref, config doesnt sound really right, metadata or marker sounds >> as >> right as config depending where you are coming from. >> >> Well this doesnt hold features so i dont want to loose time in it but now >> you know why i like value ;) >> Le 3 oct. 2013 23:21, "Gerhard Petracek" <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> a >> écrit : >> >> > -0.5 (instead of -1), because i used "value" in codi back then and >> there is >> > nothing wrong with it. >> > however, that was one of the lessons learned from using it in projects >> and >> > explaining it in trainings for almost three years. >> > what we have right now just reflects the feedback. >> > >> > regards, >> > gerhard >> > >> > >> > >> > 2013/10/3 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> >> > >> > > If config is the unique mandatory attr it should be value imo >> > > Le 3 oct. 2013 22:39, "Gerhard Petracek" <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> >> a >> > > écrit : >> > > >> > > > hi thomas, >> > > > >> > > > yes - we had something in codi and we might add something like the >> > > payload >> > > > in bv. >> > > > >> > > > regards, >> > > > gerhard >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > 2013/10/3 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> >> > > > >> > > > > @Gerhard: Are there any expected properties on @ViewRef in the >> > future? >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > 2013/10/3 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> >> > > > > >> > > > > > +1, same for @ConfigProperty btw >> > > > > > Le 3 oct. 2013 20:49, "Gerhard Petracek" < >> > gerhard.petra...@gmail.com >> > > > >> > > > a >> > > > > > écrit : >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > -0.5 for now >> > > > > > > once we add more, you get the same and it would be not that >> > > > expressive. >> > > > > > > that was the reason for changing it (compared to codi). >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > regards, >> > > > > > > gerhard >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > 2013/10/3 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hi, >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > currently @ViewRef has only one property called "config". >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > So the current usage is: >> > > > > > > > @ViewRef(config = Views.Logout.class) >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > What about renaming it to "value"? >> > > > > > > > -> @ViewRef(Views.Logout.class) >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Regards, >> > > > > > > > Thomas >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >
