+1 Romain IMO it's "nicer" to read but it's not up to me.
2013/10/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > I didnt use viewref enough to say but typically it is boring to need to > write name in configproperty each time while you know what it is. Moreover > for viewref, config doesnt sound really right, metadata or marker sounds as > right as config depending where you are coming from. > > Well this doesnt hold features so i dont want to loose time in it but now > you know why i like value ;) > Le 3 oct. 2013 23:21, "Gerhard Petracek" <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > > > -0.5 (instead of -1), because i used "value" in codi back then and there > is > > nothing wrong with it. > > however, that was one of the lessons learned from using it in projects > and > > explaining it in trainings for almost three years. > > what we have right now just reflects the feedback. > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > > > > > 2013/10/3 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > > > > If config is the unique mandatory attr it should be value imo > > > Le 3 oct. 2013 22:39, "Gerhard Petracek" <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> > a > > > écrit : > > > > > > > hi thomas, > > > > > > > > yes - we had something in codi and we might add something like the > > > payload > > > > in bv. > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > gerhard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/10/3 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > @Gerhard: Are there any expected properties on @ViewRef in the > > future? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/10/3 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > +1, same for @ConfigProperty btw > > > > > > Le 3 oct. 2013 20:49, "Gerhard Petracek" < > > gerhard.petra...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > -0.5 for now > > > > > > > once we add more, you get the same and it would be not that > > > > expressive. > > > > > > > that was the reason for changing it (compared to codi). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > gerhard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/10/3 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > currently @ViewRef has only one property called "config". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So the current usage is: > > > > > > > > @ViewRef(config = Views.Logout.class) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What about renaming it to "value"? > > > > > > > > -> @ViewRef(Views.Logout.class) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Thomas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
