It looks like the parquet patch for DRILL-7934. I'll send an email to announce the start of the release process.
On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 10:35 PM Laurent Goujon <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, let's do that! > > On Sat, May 29, 2021, 19:09 Charles Givre <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Laurent, >> We got the CVEs sorted out, and at least one of the parquet bugs was >> sorted. Maybe give it until Tuesday and if DRILL-7934 is merged, great, if >> not, we go without it and start preparing a release. >> Does that work? >> - C >> >> > On May 28, 2021, at 9:55 PM, luoc <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Laurent, >> > That's right. Thanks all for the contributions. As Charles said, We >> plan to speed up the release frequency. I'm ready to post the [VOTE] mail >> at the end of 1.19 release. >> > >> >> 在 2021年5月29日，01:55，Laurent Goujon <[email protected]> 写道： >> >> >> >> Today's update: several changes related to the CVEs have been merged, >> along >> >> with a bugfix for Parquet. Thanks to all of you who helped on those >> changes. >> >> I believe there's only one Parquet change left for DRILL-7934: >> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7934> Charles, is this >> correct? >> >> >> >> Laurent >> >> >> >>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 10:48 AM Laurent Goujon <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Some fixes/improvements were made to the codebase since the last >> release, >> >>> and sadly an official release is needed to pick up those changes. Ray >> asked >> >>> the community more than a month ago. More recently, other people have >> been >> >>> asking too on the user mailing list. >> >>> >> >>> Like I said, it might be okay to change the scope but what I'm asking >> is a >> >>> little help/transparency here because it looks like I'm chasing a >> moving >> >>> target. If we can clarify which new issues have to be part of the >> release >> >>> and why (depending on the severity), and how long we think it will >> take, >> >>> I'd hope we can have some constructive discussion. >> >>> >> >>> As for the dependencies change: >> >>> - I actually wrote a pull request to address CVEs in both Hadoop and >> Jetty >> >>> - The Guava change will not address the most recent CVE. To address >> the >> >>> CVE, code must be changed, and it doesn't require a Guava update. The >> >>> change made to the Guava library was to deprecate the unsecure >> method... So >> >>> imho updating dependencies to address CVE without looking at the CVE >> itself >> >>> does not make things safer. So to address specifically the CVE, I >> opened a >> >>> new ticket (DRILL-7936 < >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7936>) >> >>> and a pull request (https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2240) >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:30 AM Charles Givre <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> Hi Laurent, >> >>>> I’m not sure what the rush is to get a release out. I would much >> rather >> >>>> do a quality release than just get something out the door for the >> sake of >> >>>> getting something out the door. >> >>>> >> >>>> In reference to Drill-7934 (Parquet), DRILL-7919 I am personally not >> in >> >>>> favor of putting out a release with known bugs, especially when >> these bugs >> >>>> affect parts of Drill that are in active use, we don’t do releases >> that >> >>>> frequently, and there is a PR that is awaiting merge. >> >>>> >> >>>> I’m also not in favor of a release that has known issues with >> >>>> dependencies, especially again when there are pending PRs that >> address >> >>>> these CVEs. If we did more frequent releases (which we have >> discussed and >> >>>> hope to do going forward), then fine, but we’ve been averaging 2 a >> year and >> >>>> I’d hate for users to have to wait 6 months for these fixes. >> >>>> >> >>>> — C >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>> On May 27, 2021, at 12:19 PM, Laurent Goujon <[email protected]> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Since I'm also a reviewer and that I see that the past comments I've >> >>>> been >> >>>>> addressed, and since I do not see another committer opposing the >> patch, >> >>>>> wouldn't I be able to give my +1 and that would clear that bar? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> As for the parquet issues, when we started the release discussion a >> >>>> month >> >>>>> ago, we agreed on a scope, and the parquet issues were not part of >> it. I >> >>>>> understand that scope can change but can we discuss it in this >> thread >> >>>> about >> >>>>> why this release should include it vs wait on the next release? We >> need >> >>>> to >> >>>>> draw a line somewhere. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Laurent >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 8:05 AM Charles Givre <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> Laurent, >> >>>>>> Per Apache policy, you need a +1 from a reviewer to merge a PR. >> Unless >> >>>>>> there is one, please do not merge. I'll reach out to Vitalii to >> see >> >>>> what >> >>>>>> the current status is. Also there are a few bug fixes for the >> Parquet >> >>>>>> which Vova submitted which looks like we should include as well. >> >>>>>> Best, >> >>>>>> -- C >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On May 27, 2021, at 11:01 AM, Laurent Goujon <[email protected]> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Sadly, I haven't heard from people regarding the patches. At the >> same >> >>>>>> time, >> >>>>>>> I think we held the window open for merging the changes for a very >> >>>> long >> >>>>>>> time. Unless there's objection, I'm planning to merge the Guava >> and >> >>>>>>> Jetty/Hadoop pull requests later today, and doing the first RC for >> >>>> Drill >> >>>>>>> 1.19.0 >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Here are the pull request links: >> >>>>>>> * https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2202 >> >>>>>>> * https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2236 >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Laurent >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 11:59 AM Laurent Goujon < >> [email protected]> >> >>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> After several retries, the Guava checks successfully passed: >> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2202 >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Charles, can we proceed on merging your change? >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Laurent >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 10:24 PM Laurent Goujon < >> [email protected]> >> >>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Just an update. There's a patch for updating both Jetty and >> Hadoop >> >>>> (at >> >>>>>>>>> the same time) as those changes are co-dependent: >> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2236 >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> As for the Guava patch, I'd be happy to help, but I'm not sure >> >>>> what's >> >>>>>>>>> left. As far as I can tell the shaded version of Guava has been >> >>>>>> updated, >> >>>>>>>>> but the build is failing. The security vulnerabilities for >> Guava are >> >>>>>>>>> moderate (and actually it seems a fix for CVE-2020-8908 would >> >>>> require a >> >>>>>>>>> code change instead of a Guava update. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Since this has been almost a month since we started this release >> >>>>>> process, >> >>>>>>>>> I wonder if we still want to wait on this patch, or if we should >> >>>> move >> >>>>>> it to >> >>>>>>>>> the next release. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Let me know what people think, >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 8:24 AM Laurent Goujon < >> [email protected]> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Anything I can help with? >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 7:02 AM Charles Givre < >> [email protected]> >> >>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> HI Laurent, >> >>>>>>>>>>> My apologies. I said Junit, when I was meaning to say to the >> >>>> Guava >> >>>>>> PR ( >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2202 < >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2202>). I think this >> one is >> >>>>>>>>>>> almost done as well. >> >>>>>>>>>>> -- C >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On May 24, 2021, at 5:29 PM, Laurent Goujon < >> [email protected]> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, I was hoping that some of the PRs could be merged, but >> if we >> >>>> are >> >>>>>>>>>>> in >> >>>>>>>>>>>> agreement, let's start the work :) >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 6:52 PM luoc <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Charles, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> All right, we'll be expecting the update. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2021年5月24日 上午12:13，Charles Givre <[email protected]> 写道： >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Luoc, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We still have a few PRs pending that we really should get >> into >> >>>>>> Drill >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.19. The main one is the junit upgrade. There are a few >> >>>> critical >> >>>>>>>>>>> CVEs >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> associated with that, so I do think it is important to get >> that >> >>>> one >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> merged. I think Vitalii will have that one done in short >> order. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- C >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 22, 2021, at 5:16 AM, luoc <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Laurent, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It’s time to do a release with 1.19.0. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2021年5月19日 上午2:20，Vitalii Diravka <[email protected]> >> 写道： >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Laurent, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7871 requires additional time to be introduced and >> it >> >>>> is >> >>>>>>>>>>> better >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include it for the next release. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7904 is updated, I think it will be merged in a few >> >>>> days. >> >>>>>>>>>>> But it >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't matter whether it is included in this release or >> in >> >>>> the >> >>>>>>>>>>> next >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> one. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So we can plan to start the release process >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vitalii >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 7:52 PM Laurent Goujon < >> >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Vitalii >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 9:29 AM Vitalii Diravka < >> >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Luoc! >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are almost ready. I plan to update PR for them >> today. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vitalii >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 5:26 PM luoc <[email protected]> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Vitalii, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you mind sharing that... Is DRILL-7904 ready to >> >>>> review >> >>>>>>>>>>> again? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And what’s >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the status on the DRILL-7871? thanks >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2021年5月4日 下午1:10，Ted Dunning <[email protected]> >> 写道： >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Laurent, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't have a stake here, so can't really comment >> about >> >>>>>>>>>>> specifics, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> but >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process is looking good. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 9:23 PM Laurent Goujon < >> >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for all the answers >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So the issues I found based on the feedback are: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7878: Fix LGTM Alerts >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7878> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7871: StoragePluginStore instances for >> different >> >>>>>> users >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7871> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7908: Fix GitHub Actions CI >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7908> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7904: Update to 30-jre Guava version >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7904> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7826: Merge Pcap and Pcapng format plugin >> based on >> >>>>>> EVF >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7826> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7828: Refactor Pcap and Pcapng format plugin >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7828> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7910: Bumps commons-io from 2.4 to 2.7 >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7910> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7901: Bump junit from 4.12 to 4.13.1 >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7901> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wanted to propose Monday May 10th to do the first >> >>>> release >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have some concerns about some of the changes which >> may >> >>>> not >> >>>>>> be >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ready >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then considering they seem to involve some level of >> effort >> >>>>>> and >> >>>>>>>>>>> are >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early stage: The LGTM alert changes and the >> >>>>>> StoragePluginStore >> >>>>>>>>>>> model >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change. JUnit version update might also become quite a >> >>>> large >> >>>>>>>>>>> change >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> if >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead of moving to 4.13.1, Drill is switching to >> JUnit5. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do people think? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 1:00 PM Vitalii Diravka < >> >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Laurent, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to include: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7871 < >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7871 >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (preparing >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PR) >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7908 < >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7908 >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (preparing >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PR) >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7904 < >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7904 >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> (PR >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opened, in review) >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7828 < >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7828 >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> (PR >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opened, review is almost completed) >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All these tasks are expected to be completed in a week >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vitalii >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 9:25 PM Charles Givre < >> >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Laurent, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have a few PRs pending which I'd like to see in the >> >>>> next >> >>>>>>>>>>> version >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. The update(s) and bug fixes to the Mongo plugin. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. There is an extended PR for bug fixes which clean >> up a >> >>>>>> lot >> >>>>>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alerts >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generated by LGTM >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. There are a few other library updates which are >> >>>> pending. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. We have some work which changes the access model >> >>>> around >> >>>>>>>>>>> storage >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plugins which would be good for this release >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5. The PCAP/PCAP-NG consolidation is awaiting review. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think that's it. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- C >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 22, 2021, at 12:33 PM, Laurent Goujon < >> >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello everyone, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has been more than 6 months since the last release, >> >>>> and I >> >>>>>>>>>>> believe >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be a good time to discuss the next one. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As mentioned in a previous email thread, I am >> >>>> volunteering to >> >>>>>>>>>>> be the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release manager, and I'm looking forward working >> with the >> >>>>>>>>>>> whole >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to make another great release. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have around 80 changes in master since the last >> >>>> release, >> >>>>>> and >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> there >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> several changes open for review too. It would be nice >> if >> >>>>>> people >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> could >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reply >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to this email and share issues which should be part of >> >>>> that >> >>>>>>>>>>> release, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can decide on an initial cut-off date. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Laurent >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >> >> > >> >>
