Hi, I just sent the announcement email to the Apache mailing lists, and this was the last item on the release document. I guess it means that 1.19 is officially released. Thank you everyone for your help!
If I missed anything, please let me know. Cheers, Laurent On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 2:03 PM Laurent Goujon <laur...@dremio.com> wrote: > > So the vote for RC0 has been cancelled because of DRILL-7945. I will publish > a new RC with the following fixes: > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7937 > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7940 > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7945 > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7946 (Security issue) > > There has been 2 issues open since RC0 that the requestor made "blocker" > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7948 > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7949 > > I do not plan to wait on a fix for those issues because they are not > regression compared to 1.18.0. One of the issue is actually something visible > only after DRILL-7937 was addressed (and this issue was not a regression > itself). > Like stated in the RC0 email, I also do not intend to merge any of the other > junit/mockito/hamcrest version change: the junit change has actually new > comment, and all those patches do not have visible impact on the distribution > so I think they can also wait to be merged just after the release approval > (and I'll happy help get them merged). > > Laurent > > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 9:17 PM Laurent Goujon <laur...@dremio.com> wrote: >> >> It looks like the parquet patch for DRILL-7934. I'll send an email to >> announce the start of the release process. >> >> On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 10:35 PM Laurent Goujon <laur...@dremio.com> wrote: >>> >>> Ok, let's do that! >>> >>> On Sat, May 29, 2021, 19:09 Charles Givre <cgi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Laurent, >>>> We got the CVEs sorted out, and at least one of the parquet bugs was >>>> sorted. Maybe give it until Tuesday and if DRILL-7934 is merged, great, >>>> if not, we go without it and start preparing a release. >>>> Does that work? >>>> - C >>>> >>>> > On May 28, 2021, at 9:55 PM, luoc <l...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Hi Laurent, >>>> > That's right. Thanks all for the contributions. As Charles said, We >>>> > plan to speed up the release frequency. I'm ready to post the [VOTE] >>>> > mail at the end of 1.19 release. >>>> > >>>> >> 在 2021年5月29日，01:55，Laurent Goujon <laur...@dremio.com> 写道： >>>> >> >>>> >> Today's update: several changes related to the CVEs have been merged, >>>> >> along >>>> >> with a bugfix for Parquet. Thanks to all of you who helped on those >>>> >> changes. >>>> >> I believe there's only one Parquet change left for DRILL-7934: >>>> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7934> Charles, is this >>>> >> correct? >>>> >> >>>> >> Laurent >>>> >> >>>> >>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 10:48 AM Laurent Goujon <laur...@dremio.com> >>>> >>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Some fixes/improvements were made to the codebase since the last >>>> >>> release, >>>> >>> and sadly an official release is needed to pick up those changes. Ray >>>> >>> asked >>>> >>> the community more than a month ago. More recently, other people have >>>> >>> been >>>> >>> asking too on the user mailing list. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Like I said, it might be okay to change the scope but what I'm asking >>>> >>> is a >>>> >>> little help/transparency here because it looks like I'm chasing a >>>> >>> moving >>>> >>> target. If we can clarify which new issues have to be part of the >>>> >>> release >>>> >>> and why (depending on the severity), and how long we think it will >>>> >>> take, >>>> >>> I'd hope we can have some constructive discussion. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> As for the dependencies change: >>>> >>> - I actually wrote a pull request to address CVEs in both Hadoop and >>>> >>> Jetty >>>> >>> - The Guava change will not address the most recent CVE. To address the >>>> >>> CVE, code must be changed, and it doesn't require a Guava update. The >>>> >>> change made to the Guava library was to deprecate the unsecure >>>> >>> method... So >>>> >>> imho updating dependencies to address CVE without looking at the CVE >>>> >>> itself >>>> >>> does not make things safer. So to address specifically the CVE, I >>>> >>> opened a >>>> >>> new ticket (DRILL-7936 >>>> >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7936>) >>>> >>> and a pull request (https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2240) >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:30 AM Charles Givre <cgi...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Laurent, >>>> >>>> I’m not sure what the rush is to get a release out. I would much >>>> >>>> rather >>>> >>>> do a quality release than just get something out the door for the >>>> >>>> sake of >>>> >>>> getting something out the door. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> In reference to Drill-7934 (Parquet), DRILL-7919 I am personally not >>>> >>>> in >>>> >>>> favor of putting out a release with known bugs, especially when these >>>> >>>> bugs >>>> >>>> affect parts of Drill that are in active use, we don’t do releases >>>> >>>> that >>>> >>>> frequently, and there is a PR that is awaiting merge. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I’m also not in favor of a release that has known issues with >>>> >>>> dependencies, especially again when there are pending PRs that address >>>> >>>> these CVEs. If we did more frequent releases (which we have >>>> >>>> discussed and >>>> >>>> hope to do going forward), then fine, but we’ve been averaging 2 a >>>> >>>> year and >>>> >>>> I’d hate for users to have to wait 6 months for these fixes. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> — C >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On May 27, 2021, at 12:19 PM, Laurent Goujon <laur...@dremio.com> >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> Since I'm also a reviewer and that I see that the past comments I've >>>> >>>> been >>>> >>>>> addressed, and since I do not see another committer opposing the >>>> >>>>> patch, >>>> >>>>> wouldn't I be able to give my +1 and that would clear that bar? >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> As for the parquet issues, when we started the release discussion a >>>> >>>> month >>>> >>>>> ago, we agreed on a scope, and the parquet issues were not part of >>>> >>>>> it. I >>>> >>>>> understand that scope can change but can we discuss it in this thread >>>> >>>> about >>>> >>>>> why this release should include it vs wait on the next release? We >>>> >>>>> need >>>> >>>> to >>>> >>>>> draw a line somewhere. >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> Laurent >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 8:05 AM Charles Givre <cgi...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>> Laurent, >>>> >>>>>> Per Apache policy, you need a +1 from a reviewer to merge a PR. >>>> >>>>>> Unless >>>> >>>>>> there is one, please do not merge. I'll reach out to Vitalii to see >>>> >>>> what >>>> >>>>>> the current status is. Also there are a few bug fixes for the >>>> >>>>>> Parquet >>>> >>>>>> which Vova submitted which looks like we should include as well. >>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>> >>>>>> -- C >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> On May 27, 2021, at 11:01 AM, Laurent Goujon <laur...@dremio.com> >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> Sadly, I haven't heard from people regarding the patches. At the >>>> >>>>>>> same >>>> >>>>>> time, >>>> >>>>>>> I think we held the window open for merging the changes for a very >>>> >>>> long >>>> >>>>>>> time. Unless there's objection, I'm planning to merge the Guava and >>>> >>>>>>> Jetty/Hadoop pull requests later today, and doing the first RC for >>>> >>>> Drill >>>> >>>>>>> 1.19.0 >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> Here are the pull request links: >>>> >>>>>>> * https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2202 >>>> >>>>>>> * https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2236 >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> Laurent >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 11:59 AM Laurent Goujon >>>> >>>>>>> <laur...@dremio.com> >>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> After several retries, the Guava checks successfully passed: >>>> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2202 >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> Charles, can we proceed on merging your change? >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> Laurent >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 10:24 PM Laurent Goujon >>>> >>>>>>>> <laur...@dremio.com> >>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Just an update. There's a patch for updating both Jetty and >>>> >>>>>>>>> Hadoop >>>> >>>> (at >>>> >>>>>>>>> the same time) as those changes are co-dependent: >>>> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2236 >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> As for the Guava patch, I'd be happy to help, but I'm not sure >>>> >>>> what's >>>> >>>>>>>>> left. As far as I can tell the shaded version of Guava has been >>>> >>>>>> updated, >>>> >>>>>>>>> but the build is failing. The security vulnerabilities for Guava >>>> >>>>>>>>> are >>>> >>>>>>>>> moderate (and actually it seems a fix for CVE-2020-8908 would >>>> >>>> require a >>>> >>>>>>>>> code change instead of a Guava update. >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Since this has been almost a month since we started this release >>>> >>>>>> process, >>>> >>>>>>>>> I wonder if we still want to wait on this patch, or if we should >>>> >>>> move >>>> >>>>>> it to >>>> >>>>>>>>> the next release. >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Let me know what people think, >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 8:24 AM Laurent Goujon >>>> >>>>>>>>> <laur...@dremio.com> >>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> Anything I can help with? >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 7:02 AM Charles Givre <cgi...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> HI Laurent, >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> My apologies. I said Junit, when I was meaning to say to the >>>> >>>> Guava >>>> >>>>>> PR ( >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2202 < >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2202>). I think this one >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> is >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> almost done as well. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- C >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On May 24, 2021, at 5:29 PM, Laurent Goujon >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <laur...@dremio.com> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, I was hoping that some of the PRs could be merged, but if >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>> >>>> are >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> in >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> agreement, let's start the work :) >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 6:52 PM luoc <l...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Charles, >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> All right, we'll be expecting the update. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2021年5月24日 上午12:13，Charles Givre <cgi...@gmail.com> 写道： >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Luoc, >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We still have a few PRs pending that we really should get >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> into >>>> >>>>>> Drill >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.19. The main one is the junit upgrade. There are a few >>>> >>>> critical >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> CVEs >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> associated with that, so I do think it is important to get >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>> >>>> one >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> merged. I think Vitalii will have that one done in short >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> order. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- C >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 22, 2021, at 5:16 AM, luoc <l...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Laurent, >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It’s time to do a release with 1.19.0. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2021年5月19日 上午2:20，Vitalii Diravka <vita...@apache.org> 写道： >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Laurent, >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7871 requires additional time to be introduced and >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>> >>>> is >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> better >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include it for the next release. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7904 is updated, I think it will be merged in a few >>>> >>>> days. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> But it >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't matter whether it is included in this release or >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>> >>>> the >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> next >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> one. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So we can plan to start the release process >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vitalii >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 7:52 PM Laurent Goujon < >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> laur...@dremio.com> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Vitalii >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 9:29 AM Vitalii Diravka < >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> vita...@apache.org> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Luoc! >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are almost ready. I plan to update PR for them >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vitalii >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 5:26 PM luoc <l...@apache.org> >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Vitalii, >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you mind sharing that... Is DRILL-7904 ready to >>>> >>>> review >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> again? >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And what’s >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the status on the DRILL-7871? thanks >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2021年5月4日 下午1:10，Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 写道： >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Laurent, >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't have a stake here, so can't really comment >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> specifics, >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process is looking good. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 9:23 PM Laurent Goujon < >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> laur...@dremio.com> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for all the answers >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So the issues I found based on the feedback are: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7878: Fix LGTM Alerts >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7878> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7871: StoragePluginStore instances for >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different >>>> >>>>>> users >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7871> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7908: Fix GitHub Actions CI >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7908> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7904: Update to 30-jre Guava version >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7904> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7826: Merge Pcap and Pcapng format plugin >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on >>>> >>>>>> EVF >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7826> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7828: Refactor Pcap and Pcapng format plugin >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7828> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7910: Bumps commons-io from 2.4 to 2.7 >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7910> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7901: Bump junit from 4.12 to 4.13.1 >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7901> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wanted to propose Monday May 10th to do the first >>>> >>>> release >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate, >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have some concerns about some of the changes which >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may >>>> >>>> not >>>> >>>>>> be >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ready >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then considering they seem to involve some level of >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort >>>> >>>>>> and >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> are >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early stage: The LGTM alert changes and the >>>> >>>>>> StoragePluginStore >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> model >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change. JUnit version update might also become quite a >>>> >>>> large >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> change >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> if >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead of moving to 4.13.1, Drill is switching to >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JUnit5. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do people think? >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 1:00 PM Vitalii Diravka < >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> vita...@apache.org >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Laurent, >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to include: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7871 < >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7871 >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (preparing >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PR) >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7908 < >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7908 >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (preparing >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PR) >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7904 < >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7904 >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> (PR >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opened, in review) >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7828 < >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7828 >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> (PR >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opened, review is almost completed) >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All these tasks are expected to be completed in a week >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vitalii >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 9:25 PM Charles Givre < >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> cgi...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Laurent, >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have a few PRs pending which I'd like to see in the >>>> >>>> next >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> version >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. The update(s) and bug fixes to the Mongo plugin. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. There is an extended PR for bug fixes which clean >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up a >>>> >>>>>> lot >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> of >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alerts >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generated by LGTM >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. There are a few other library updates which are >>>> >>>> pending. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. We have some work which changes the access model >>>> >>>> around >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> storage >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plugins which would be good for this release >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5. The PCAP/PCAP-NG consolidation is awaiting review. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think that's it. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- C >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 22, 2021, at 12:33 PM, Laurent Goujon < >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> laur...@dremio.com> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello everyone, >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has been more than 6 months since the last release, >>>> >>>> and I >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> believe >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be a good time to discuss the next one. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As mentioned in a previous email thread, I am >>>> >>>> volunteering to >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> be the >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release manager, and I'm looking forward working with >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> whole >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to make another great release. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have around 80 changes in master since the last >>>> >>>> release, >>>> >>>>>> and >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> there >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> several changes open for review too. It would be nice >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if >>>> >>>>>> people >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> could >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reply >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to this email and share issues which should be part of >>>> >>>> that >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> release, >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can decide on an initial cut-off date. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance, >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Laurent >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>>
