So the vote for RC0 has been cancelled because of DRILL-7945 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7945>. I will publish a new RC with the following fixes: - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7937 - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7940 - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7945 - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7946 (Security issue)
There has been 2 issues open since RC0 that the requestor made "blocker" - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7948 - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7949 I do not plan to wait on a fix for those issues because they are not regression compared to 1.18.0. One of the issue is actually something visible only after DRILL-7937 was addressed (and this issue was not a regression itself). Like stated in the RC0 email, I also do not intend to merge any of the other junit/mockito/hamcrest version change: the junit change has actually new comment, and all those patches do not have visible impact on the distribution so I think they can also wait to be merged just after the release approval (and I'll happy help get them merged). Laurent On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 9:17 PM Laurent Goujon <[email protected]> wrote: > It looks like the parquet patch for DRILL-7934. I'll send an email to > announce the start of the release process. > > On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 10:35 PM Laurent Goujon <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Ok, let's do that! >> >> On Sat, May 29, 2021, 19:09 Charles Givre <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Laurent, >>> We got the CVEs sorted out, and at least one of the parquet bugs was >>> sorted. Maybe give it until Tuesday and if DRILL-7934 is merged, great, if >>> not, we go without it and start preparing a release. >>> Does that work? >>> - C >>> >>> > On May 28, 2021, at 9:55 PM, luoc <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi Laurent, >>> > That's right. Thanks all for the contributions. As Charles said, We >>> plan to speed up the release frequency. I'm ready to post the [VOTE] mail >>> at the end of 1.19 release. >>> > >>> >> 在 2021年5月29日，01:55，Laurent Goujon <[email protected]> 写道： >>> >> >>> >> Today's update: several changes related to the CVEs have been >>> merged, along >>> >> with a bugfix for Parquet. Thanks to all of you who helped on those >>> changes. >>> >> I believe there's only one Parquet change left for DRILL-7934: >>> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7934> Charles, is this >>> correct? >>> >> >>> >> Laurent >>> >> >>> >>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 10:48 AM Laurent Goujon <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Some fixes/improvements were made to the codebase since the last >>> release, >>> >>> and sadly an official release is needed to pick up those changes. >>> Ray asked >>> >>> the community more than a month ago. More recently, other people >>> have been >>> >>> asking too on the user mailing list. >>> >>> >>> >>> Like I said, it might be okay to change the scope but what I'm >>> asking is a >>> >>> little help/transparency here because it looks like I'm chasing a >>> moving >>> >>> target. If we can clarify which new issues have to be part of the >>> release >>> >>> and why (depending on the severity), and how long we think it will >>> take, >>> >>> I'd hope we can have some constructive discussion. >>> >>> >>> >>> As for the dependencies change: >>> >>> - I actually wrote a pull request to address CVEs in both Hadoop and >>> Jetty >>> >>> - The Guava change will not address the most recent CVE. To address >>> the >>> >>> CVE, code must be changed, and it doesn't require a Guava update. The >>> >>> change made to the Guava library was to deprecate the unsecure >>> method... So >>> >>> imho updating dependencies to address CVE without looking at the CVE >>> itself >>> >>> does not make things safer. So to address specifically the CVE, I >>> opened a >>> >>> new ticket (DRILL-7936 < >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7936>) >>> >>> and a pull request (https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2240) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:30 AM Charles Givre <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Hi Laurent, >>> >>>> I’m not sure what the rush is to get a release out. I would much >>> rather >>> >>>> do a quality release than just get something out the door for the >>> sake of >>> >>>> getting something out the door. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> In reference to Drill-7934 (Parquet), DRILL-7919 I am personally >>> not in >>> >>>> favor of putting out a release with known bugs, especially when >>> these bugs >>> >>>> affect parts of Drill that are in active use, we don’t do releases >>> that >>> >>>> frequently, and there is a PR that is awaiting merge. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I’m also not in favor of a release that has known issues with >>> >>>> dependencies, especially again when there are pending PRs that >>> address >>> >>>> these CVEs. If we did more frequent releases (which we have >>> discussed and >>> >>>> hope to do going forward), then fine, but we’ve been averaging 2 a >>> year and >>> >>>> I’d hate for users to have to wait 6 months for these fixes. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> — C >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> On May 27, 2021, at 12:19 PM, Laurent Goujon <[email protected]> >>> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Since I'm also a reviewer and that I see that the past comments >>> I've >>> >>>> been >>> >>>>> addressed, and since I do not see another committer opposing the >>> patch, >>> >>>>> wouldn't I be able to give my +1 and that would clear that bar? >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> As for the parquet issues, when we started the release discussion a >>> >>>> month >>> >>>>> ago, we agreed on a scope, and the parquet issues were not part of >>> it. I >>> >>>>> understand that scope can change but can we discuss it in this >>> thread >>> >>>> about >>> >>>>> why this release should include it vs wait on the next release? We >>> need >>> >>>> to >>> >>>>> draw a line somewhere. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Laurent >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 8:05 AM Charles Givre <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>> Laurent, >>> >>>>>> Per Apache policy, you need a +1 from a reviewer to merge a PR. >>> Unless >>> >>>>>> there is one, please do not merge. I'll reach out to Vitalii to >>> see >>> >>>> what >>> >>>>>> the current status is. Also there are a few bug fixes for the >>> Parquet >>> >>>>>> which Vova submitted which looks like we should include as well. >>> >>>>>> Best, >>> >>>>>> -- C >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> On May 27, 2021, at 11:01 AM, Laurent Goujon <[email protected] >>> > >>> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Sadly, I haven't heard from people regarding the patches. At the >>> same >>> >>>>>> time, >>> >>>>>>> I think we held the window open for merging the changes for a >>> very >>> >>>> long >>> >>>>>>> time. Unless there's objection, I'm planning to merge the Guava >>> and >>> >>>>>>> Jetty/Hadoop pull requests later today, and doing the first RC >>> for >>> >>>> Drill >>> >>>>>>> 1.19.0 >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Here are the pull request links: >>> >>>>>>> * https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2202 >>> >>>>>>> * https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2236 >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Laurent >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 11:59 AM Laurent Goujon < >>> [email protected]> >>> >>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> After several retries, the Guava checks successfully passed: >>> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2202 >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> Charles, can we proceed on merging your change? >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> Laurent >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 10:24 PM Laurent Goujon < >>> [email protected]> >>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> Just an update. There's a patch for updating both Jetty and >>> Hadoop >>> >>>> (at >>> >>>>>>>>> the same time) as those changes are co-dependent: >>> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2236 >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> As for the Guava patch, I'd be happy to help, but I'm not sure >>> >>>> what's >>> >>>>>>>>> left. As far as I can tell the shaded version of Guava has been >>> >>>>>> updated, >>> >>>>>>>>> but the build is failing. The security vulnerabilities for >>> Guava are >>> >>>>>>>>> moderate (and actually it seems a fix for CVE-2020-8908 would >>> >>>> require a >>> >>>>>>>>> code change instead of a Guava update. >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> Since this has been almost a month since we started this >>> release >>> >>>>>> process, >>> >>>>>>>>> I wonder if we still want to wait on this patch, or if we >>> should >>> >>>> move >>> >>>>>> it to >>> >>>>>>>>> the next release. >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> Let me know what people think, >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 8:24 AM Laurent Goujon < >>> [email protected]> >>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Anything I can help with? >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 7:02 AM Charles Givre < >>> [email protected]> >>> >>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> HI Laurent, >>> >>>>>>>>>>> My apologies. I said Junit, when I was meaning to say to the >>> >>>> Guava >>> >>>>>> PR ( >>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2202 < >>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2202>). I think this >>> one is >>> >>>>>>>>>>> almost done as well. >>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- C >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On May 24, 2021, at 5:29 PM, Laurent Goujon < >>> [email protected]> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, I was hoping that some of the PRs could be merged, but >>> if we >>> >>>> are >>> >>>>>>>>>>> in >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> agreement, let's start the work :) >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 6:52 PM luoc <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Charles, >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> All right, we'll be expecting the update. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2021年5月24日 上午12:13，Charles Givre <[email protected]> 写道： >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Luoc, >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We still have a few PRs pending that we really should get >>> into >>> >>>>>> Drill >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.19. The main one is the junit upgrade. There are a few >>> >>>> critical >>> >>>>>>>>>>> CVEs >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> associated with that, so I do think it is important to get >>> that >>> >>>> one >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> merged. I think Vitalii will have that one done in short >>> order. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- C >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 22, 2021, at 5:16 AM, luoc <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Laurent, >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It’s time to do a release with 1.19.0. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2021年5月19日 上午2:20，Vitalii Diravka <[email protected]> >>> 写道： >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Laurent, >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7871 requires additional time to be introduced >>> and it >>> >>>> is >>> >>>>>>>>>>> better >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include it for the next release. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7904 is updated, I think it will be merged in a >>> few >>> >>>> days. >>> >>>>>>>>>>> But it >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't matter whether it is included in this release >>> or in >>> >>>> the >>> >>>>>>>>>>> next >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> one. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So we can plan to start the release process >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vitalii >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 7:52 PM Laurent Goujon < >>> >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Vitalii >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 9:29 AM Vitalii Diravka < >>> >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Luoc! >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are almost ready. I plan to update PR for them >>> today. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vitalii >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 5:26 PM luoc <[email protected]> >>> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Vitalii, >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you mind sharing that... Is DRILL-7904 ready to >>> >>>> review >>> >>>>>>>>>>> again? >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And what’s >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the status on the DRILL-7871? thanks >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2021年5月4日 下午1:10，Ted Dunning <[email protected]> >>> 写道： >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Laurent, >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't have a stake here, so can't really comment >>> about >>> >>>>>>>>>>> specifics, >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> but >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process is looking good. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 9:23 PM Laurent Goujon < >>> >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for all the answers >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So the issues I found based on the feedback are: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7878: Fix LGTM Alerts >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7878> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7871: StoragePluginStore instances for >>> different >>> >>>>>> users >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7871> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7908: Fix GitHub Actions CI >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7908> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7904: Update to 30-jre Guava version >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7904> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7826: Merge Pcap and Pcapng format plugin >>> based on >>> >>>>>> EVF >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7826> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7828: Refactor Pcap and Pcapng format plugin >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7828> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7910: Bumps commons-io from 2.4 to 2.7 >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7910> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7901: Bump junit from 4.12 to 4.13.1 >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7901> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wanted to propose Monday May 10th to do the first >>> >>>> release >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate, >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have some concerns about some of the changes which >>> may >>> >>>> not >>> >>>>>> be >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ready >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then considering they seem to involve some level of >>> effort >>> >>>>>> and >>> >>>>>>>>>>> are >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early stage: The LGTM alert changes and the >>> >>>>>> StoragePluginStore >>> >>>>>>>>>>> model >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change. JUnit version update might also become quite >>> a >>> >>>> large >>> >>>>>>>>>>> change >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> if >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead of moving to 4.13.1, Drill is switching to >>> JUnit5. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do people think? >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 1:00 PM Vitalii Diravka < >>> >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Laurent, >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to include: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7871 < >>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7871 >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (preparing >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PR) >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7908 < >>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7908 >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (preparing >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PR) >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7904 < >>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7904 >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> (PR >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opened, in review) >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7828 < >>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7828 >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> (PR >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opened, review is almost completed) >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All these tasks are expected to be completed in a >>> week >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vitalii >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 9:25 PM Charles Givre < >>> >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Laurent, >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have a few PRs pending which I'd like to see in >>> the >>> >>>> next >>> >>>>>>>>>>> version >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. The update(s) and bug fixes to the Mongo plugin. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. There is an extended PR for bug fixes which >>> clean up a >>> >>>>>> lot >>> >>>>>>>>>>> of >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alerts >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generated by LGTM >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. There are a few other library updates which are >>> >>>> pending. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. We have some work which changes the access model >>> >>>> around >>> >>>>>>>>>>> storage >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plugins which would be good for this release >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5. The PCAP/PCAP-NG consolidation is awaiting >>> review. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think that's it. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- C >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 22, 2021, at 12:33 PM, Laurent Goujon < >>> >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello everyone, >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has been more than 6 months since the last >>> release, >>> >>>> and I >>> >>>>>>>>>>> believe >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be a good time to discuss the next one. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As mentioned in a previous email thread, I am >>> >>>> volunteering to >>> >>>>>>>>>>> be the >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release manager, and I'm looking forward working >>> with the >>> >>>>>>>>>>> whole >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to make another great release. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have around 80 changes in master since the last >>> >>>> release, >>> >>>>>> and >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> there >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> several changes open for review too. It would be >>> nice if >>> >>>>>> people >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> could >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reply >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to this email and share issues which should be part >>> of >>> >>>> that >>> >>>>>>>>>>> release, >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can decide on an initial cut-off date. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance, >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Laurent >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>> > >>> >>>
