Vote +1. There are more and more contributors and they are making great contributions to Apache Eagle. Eagle codes are more stable and documents are more helpful to use eagle system.
Besides, Eagle team are working with other developers in other corporations to discuss some features and optimizations to make eagle more powerful. I am also happy to become an Eagle committer and hope Eagle will be better. Thanks Jinhu On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Da Zhou <daveloperz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Vote +1. > "Eagle Maturity Assessment" looks good to me. Great process has been made > since last discussion: > > - Lots of new features have been introduced, now Apache Eagle has become > more powerful and user-friendly.(eg, Application Management through Eagle > UI.) > - Also many fixes have been checked in, which makes Eagle more stable and > robust. > - Community is getting more active, we can tell this based on daily > discussion happened in the emails. > - Apache Eagle is getting more attention by different corporations and > organizations, their cooperation has been reported online (eg, Yahoo News) > > Regards, > Da > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Edward Zhang <yonzhang2...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi Eagle Community, > > > > It's been more than 2 months and a lot have been improved since we last > > time discussed Eagle graduation. Here I want to suggest we restart > > discussion of Eagle graduation. Please share your comments. > > > > Some documents and data are as follows: > > 1. Maturity assessment, > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+ > > Podling+Maturity+Assessment > > 2. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Documentation > > 3. Four new committers were added since incubation > > 4. Two releases are made > > 5. >600 Jira tickets, > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EAGLE-614?jql= > project%20%3D%20EAGLE > > 6. ~500 pull requests. > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-eagle/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr > > > > Thanks > > Edward > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Ge, Jing <ji...@ebay.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Jijun, > > > > > > Thanks for your nice feedback and excellent contribution. We appreciate > > it. > > > > > > Best regards > > > Jing > > > > > > On 9/30/16, 8:43 PM, "Tang Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽)" <tangji...@yhd.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > Great work! Great advances have been made for Apache Eagle. > > > I think Apache Eagle will became a great project for community with > > > these improvement. > > > > > > Best Wishes > > > > > > 唐觊隽 > > > Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech Dept > > > Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang, Shanghai (201203) > > > > > > -----邮件原件----- > > > 发件人: Ge, Jing [mailto:ji...@ebay.com] > > > 发送时间: 2016年9月30日 19:50 > > > 收件人: dev@eagle.incubator.apache.org; Tang Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽) > > > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate? > > > > > > Hi Jijun, > > > > > > Thanks for pointing out where we can improve ourselves. We have > been > > > working on that since we got your email. Now: > > > > > > 1. We have CI server which will make sure the code will be stable > and > > > build will be successful. > > > 2. We have more than 430 Unit tests. > > > 3. We have published fundamental documentation to let user and > > > developer understand Eagle and will continue working on them a. > > Development > > > Guide https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/ > Development+Guide > > > b. Product features introduction https://cwiki.apache.org/ > > > confluence/display/EAG/Development+Guide > > > c. More information w.r.t. roadmap or technical design, etc. can be > > > found at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle > > > > > > Speaking of documentation, many thanks for your contribution to the > > > Alert Engine on Spark Streaming https://cwiki.apache.org/ > > > confluence/display/EAG/Alert+Engine+on+Spark+Streaming. We really > > > appreciate it. > > > > > > Your concerns should be solved. please let us know your thoughts. > > > > > > Best regards > > > Jing > > > > > > On 9/1/16, 1:17 PM, "Michael Wu" <mchl....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Security page at http://eagle.incubator.apache. > > org/sup/index.html > > > is > > > updated with new content, please review if it conforms to what > we > > > expected. > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Michael Wu < > mchl....@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi mentors, > > > > > > > > I will update security page content taking the mentioned > > aspects. > > > > > > > > Except for the security part, is there any other gaps that > you > > > feel eagle > > > > has to fill before graduation? Please feel free to point > issues > > > out and we > > > > will do our best to get aligned to what graduation requires. > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > Michael > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Julian Hyde < > jh...@apache.org > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> I did a quick survey, and it seems that most projects do not > > > have a > > > >> security team[1], which means that vulnerabilities should be > > > reported to > > > >> secur...@apache.org. Of the projects that do, Kafka seems a > > > good model > > > >> to follow; its security page is simple and clear[2]. > > > >> > > > >> Julian > > > >> > > > >> [1] http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html < > > > >> http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html> > > > >> > > > >> [2] http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html < > > > >> http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:29 PM, P. Taylor Goetz < > > > ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > The maturity model assessment looks good to me, though I > > > haven't delved > > > >> deep into it. > > > >> > > > > >> > Regarding security issues, since Eagle is a > security-related > > > product I > > > >> would expect there to be a well-defined process/protocol > that > > > ensured > > > >> vulnerability reports were kept private until patched, CVE > > > process, etc. > > > >> Eagle hasn't had any major security issues during > incubation, > > > but should be > > > >> prepared for them after graduation. > > > >> > > > > >> > Here [1] [2] are two great resources for understanding > what > > > is expected > > > >> from an ASF standpoint. > > > >> > > > > >> > -Taylor > > > >> > > > > >> > [1] http://www.apache.org/security/ > > > >> > [2] http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html > > > >> > > > > >> >> On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:52 PM, Julian Hyde < > jh...@apache.org > > > > > > wrote: > > > >> >> > > > >> >> I reviewed https://cwiki.apache.org/confl > > > >> uence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment < > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podli > > > >> ng+Maturity+Assessment> and it looks good. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Only one issue. Regarding QU30: The dev list and JIRA > > > (listed in > > > >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html < > > > >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html>) do not > > seem > > > >> appropriate places to report security issues, because they > are > > > public. Is a > > > >> private channel needed? > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Can some other mentors please review? > > > >> >> > > > >> >> I think the consensus is emerging that Eagle is ready to > > > graduate. The > > > >> community should start taking steps to graduate, including > > > agreeing bylaws > > > >> (or deciding that bylaws are not necessary), choosing an > > > initial PMC chair, > > > >> crafting the resolution for the Board, and starting a vote > > > thread. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Julian > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >>> On Jul 31, 2016, at 9:05 PM, Edward Zhang < > > > yonzhang2...@apache.org> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> I have commented some assessment points and we can > remove > > > that once > > > >> after > > > >> >>> they are reviewed. > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> Thanks > > > >> >>> Edward > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Hao Chen < > > h...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> Thanks Michael for preparing the "Eagle Podling > Maturity > > > Assessment". > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> Eagle community, > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> could you (in particular Mentors & PPMC) please help > > > review and > > > >> comment? > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> - Hao > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Michael Wu < > > > mchl....@gmail.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> Hi guys, > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> Following the model Julian cited, we created a wiki > page > > > for > > > >> >>>>> self-assessment at: > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+ > > > Podlin > > > >> g+Maturity+Assessment > > > >> >>>>> . > > > >> >>>>> Please take a look at it and make your valuable > > judgement > > > and > > > >> >>>> instructions. > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> Overall, according to the aspects that the model > values > > > and > > > >> inspects, and > > > >> >>>>> traverse the results listed in the wiki page, > > personally, > > > I think > > > >> Eagle > > > >> >>>> is > > > >> >>>>> approaching the point of graduation, and is facing the > > > right way > > > >> towards > > > >> >>>>> it. (please correct me if i'm wrong, thanks) > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> In this assessment wiki page, status "OK" stands for > the > > > all > > > >> resolved > > > >> >>>>> items, status "ON GOING" stands for 2 items that we're > > > striving to > > > >> work > > > >> >>>> on > > > >> >>>>> and will update. Additionally, there is 1 item marked > as > > > "NOT APPLY" > > > >> >>>>> because the "convenient binaries" model seems not > > fitting > > > for eagle, > > > >> >>>> could > > > >> >>>>> you please verify if it's true and rule RE40 > > > >> >>>>> < > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+ > > > Podlin > > > >> g+Maturity+Assessment#EaglePodlingMaturityAssessment-RE40 > > > >> >>>>>> > > > >> >>>>> could be skipped? > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> Any comment and instruction will be appreciated, as > all > > > we made or > > > >> will > > > >> >>>>> make is to keep the project running in the right way. > :) > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> Michael > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Hao Chen < > > > h...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> >>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>> Thanks very much for bringing up graduation > discussion > > > for Eagle. > > > >> >>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>> Eagle community has almost fully understand how to > run > > > an open > > > >> source > > > >> >>>>>> project in apache way. Apache Eagle (incubating) is > > now > > > open to be > > > >> >>>>>> contributed and adopted by lots of different > > > organizations > > > >> including > > > >> >>>> but > > > >> >>>>>> not limited to eBay, Paypal, Dataguides, Yihaodian, > > etc. > > > The > > > >> community > > > >> >>>>> has > > > >> >>>>>> continuously been building and expanding itself by > > > sharing and > > > >> talking > > > >> >>>>>> eagle with the word industry in international > > > conferences like > > > >> Hadoop > > > >> >>>>>> Summit, Hadoop Stratus, QCon in San Jose, London, > > > Dublin, Shanghai, > > > >> >>>>>> Beijing, etc. and also lots of meetups. And the > > > community has > > > >> >>>>> successfully > > > >> >>>>>> release v0.3.0, v0.4.0 and is actively preparing > v0.5.0 > > > following > > > >> >>>> apache > > > >> >>>>>> releasing process. > > > >> >>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>> To make it clear how close is eagle ready to > graduate, > > > right now > > > >> the > > > >> >>>>>> community is working on preparing an "Eagle Podling > > > Maturity > > > >> >>>> Assessment" > > > >> >>>>> to > > > >> >>>>>> measure how mature eagle is and what tasks may remain > > > before > > > >> >>>> graduation, > > > >> >>>>>> will be sent out very soon. > > > >> >>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>> - Hao > > > >> >>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:25 AM, P. Taylor Goetz < > > > >> ptgo...@gmail.com> > > > >> >>>>>> wrote: > > > >> >>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>>> Graduation is mostly about whether a podling is > > healthy > > > in terms > > > >> of > > > >> >>>>>>> growing the community and making releases. I don't > > > think technical > > > >> >>>>> issues > > > >> >>>>>>> are relevant here. > > > >> >>>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>>> -Taylor > > > >> >>>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>>>> On Jul 28, 2016, at 8:12 PM, Tang > > > Jijun(上海_技术部_架构部_大数据平台_唐觊隽) < > > > >> >>>>>>> tangji...@yhd.com> wrote: > > > >> >>>>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>>>> I don't think eagle is ready to graduate. > > > >> >>>>>>>> Because > > > >> >>>>>>>> 1 Code is not stable. > > > >> >>>>>>>> 2 Project need more unit test. > > > >> >>>>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>>>> Best Wishes > > > >> >>>>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>>>> 唐觊隽 > > > >> >>>>>>>> Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech Dept > > > >> >>>>>>>> Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang, Shanghai > > > (201203) > > > >> >>>>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>>>> -----邮件原件----- > > > >> >>>>>>>> 发件人: Edward Zhang [mailto:yonzhang2...@apache.org] > > > >> >>>>>>>> 发送时间: 2016年7月29日 5:19 > > > >> >>>>>>>> 收件人: dev@eagle.incubator.apache.org > > > >> >>>>>>>> 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate? > > > >> >>>>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>>>> Yes, we should discuss that on the list, and will > go > > > through > > > >> >>>> maturity > > > >> >>>>>>> model first soon. > > > >> >>>>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>>>> Thanks > > > >> >>>>>>>> Edward > > > >> >>>>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Julian Hyde < > > > jh...@apache.org> > > > >> >>>>>> wrote: > > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> … also want to discuss this with other > > contributors. > > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Why not discuss with them on this list? > > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Julian > > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
