+1 Very glad to hear that Eagle is infinitely closing to graduate at a top-level project since entering incubator at Oct 26th, 2016.
In the past one year, the eagle community has always keep learning, growing and practicing apache way every where and every day: - Meritocracy - Peer to Peer - Consensus decision making - Open, online communication - Responsible oversight Until now (10/26/2015 ~ 10/18/2016), eagle community has grown very fast in features, code quality, community, consensus building etc. - Reached a very high maturity level: https://cwiki.apache.org/ confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment> - Added *4+* new committers and *20+* contributors from different organizations around the world side - Successfully released *2* major versions and some minor versions, resolved *632+* jira tickets and *577+* pull requests. - *5+* public originations (e.g. eBay, Paypal, Yihaodian, Dataguise, etc.) are using or adopting eagle to monitor their hadoop clusters. - Shared eagle and apache way in *10+* tech conferences in* 8+ *different cities around the world (e.g. Hadoop Summit, Hadoop Stratus, QCon, etc.) - Hao On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Michael Wu <m...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 > > - 2 releases have been made and committers have summed lots of experience > of the releasing process. > - More and more contributions are received from the community. > - JIRA tickets are all with detailed descriptions. > - PRs follow a good way of collaboration. > - The project is being established in the industry. > - Responses are made timely to requesters. > > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Liangfei.Su <suliang...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Eagle Maturity Assessment clear listed and completed. > > JIRA with clear comments. > > PRs follow the convention that point to given JIRA by apache naming. This > > keeps clear commit history and friendly comments. > > Very happy to see more contributors other than originators to join in. > > Documentation, these are continuing improved to help community easier to > > involve in. > > > > Thanks, > > Ralph > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Jinhu Wu <jinhu.wu....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Vote +1. > > > > > > There are more and more contributors and they are making great > > > contributions to Apache Eagle. > > > Eagle codes are more stable and documents are more helpful to use eagle > > > system. > > > > > > Besides, Eagle team are working with other developers in other > > corporations > > > to discuss some features and optimizations to make eagle more powerful. > > > > > > I am also happy to become an Eagle committer and hope Eagle will be > > better. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Jinhu > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Da Zhou <daveloperz...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Vote +1. > > > > "Eagle Maturity Assessment" looks good to me. Great process has been > > > made > > > > since last discussion: > > > > > > > > - Lots of new features have been introduced, now Apache Eagle has > > become > > > > more powerful and user-friendly.(eg, Application Management through > > > Eagle > > > > UI.) > > > > - Also many fixes have been checked in, which makes Eagle more stable > > and > > > > robust. > > > > - Community is getting more active, we can tell this based on daily > > > > discussion happened in the emails. > > > > - Apache Eagle is getting more attention by different corporations > and > > > > organizations, their cooperation has been reported online (eg, Yahoo > > > News) > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Da > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Edward Zhang < > yonzhang2...@apache.org > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Eagle Community, > > > > > > > > > > It's been more than 2 months and a lot have been improved since we > > last > > > > > time discussed Eagle graduation. Here I want to suggest we restart > > > > > discussion of Eagle graduation. Please share your comments. > > > > > > > > > > Some documents and data are as follows: > > > > > 1. Maturity assessment, > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+ > > > > > Podling+Maturity+Assessment > > > > > 2. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Documentation > > > > > 3. Four new committers were added since incubation > > > > > 4. Two releases are made > > > > > 5. >600 Jira tickets, > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EAGLE-614?jql= > > > > project%20%3D%20EAGLE > > > > > 6. ~500 pull requests. > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-eagle/pulls?utf8=% > > > E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > Edward > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Ge, Jing <ji...@ebay.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Jijun, > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your nice feedback and excellent contribution. We > > > appreciate > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards > > > > > > Jing > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/30/16, 8:43 PM, "Tang Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽)" < > > > tangji...@yhd.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Great work! Great advances have been made for Apache Eagle. > > > > > > I think Apache Eagle will became a great project for > community > > > with > > > > > > these improvement. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Wishes > > > > > > > > > > > > 唐觊隽 > > > > > > Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech Dept > > > > > > Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang, Shanghai (201203) > > > > > > > > > > > > -----邮件原件----- > > > > > > 发件人: Ge, Jing [mailto:ji...@ebay.com] > > > > > > 发送时间: 2016年9月30日 19:50 > > > > > > 收件人: dev@eagle.incubator.apache.org; Tang > > Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽) > > > > > > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate? > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Jijun, > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for pointing out where we can improve ourselves. We > have > > > > been > > > > > > working on that since we got your email. Now: > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. We have CI server which will make sure the code will be > > stable > > > > and > > > > > > build will be successful. > > > > > > 2. We have more than 430 Unit tests. > > > > > > 3. We have published fundamental documentation to let user > and > > > > > > developer understand Eagle and will continue working on them a. > > > > > Development > > > > > > Guide https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/ > > > > Development+Guide > > > > > > b. Product features introduction https://cwiki.apache.org/ > > > > > > confluence/display/EAG/Development+Guide > > > > > > c. More information w.r.t. roadmap or technical design, etc. > > can > > > be > > > > > > found at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle > > > > > > > > > > > > Speaking of documentation, many thanks for your contribution > to > > > the > > > > > > Alert Engine on Spark Streaming https://cwiki.apache.org/ > > > > > > confluence/display/EAG/Alert+Engine+on+Spark+Streaming. We > really > > > > > > appreciate it. > > > > > > > > > > > > Your concerns should be solved. please let us know your > > thoughts. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards > > > > > > Jing > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/1/16, 1:17 PM, "Michael Wu" <mchl....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Security page at http://eagle.incubator.apache. > > > > > org/sup/index.html > > > > > > is > > > > > > updated with new content, please review if it conforms to > > > what > > > > we > > > > > > expected. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Michael Wu < > > > > mchl....@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi mentors, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will update security page content taking the > mentioned > > > > > aspects. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Except for the security part, is there any other gaps > > that > > > > you > > > > > > feel eagle > > > > > > > has to fill before graduation? Please feel free to > point > > > > issues > > > > > > out and we > > > > > > > will do our best to get aligned to what graduation > > > requires. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Michael > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Julian Hyde < > > > > jh...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I did a quick survey, and it seems that most projects > do > > > not > > > > > > have a > > > > > > >> security team[1], which means that vulnerabilities > > should > > > be > > > > > > reported to > > > > > > >> secur...@apache.org. Of the projects that do, Kafka > > > seems a > > > > > > good model > > > > > > >> to follow; its security page is simple and clear[2]. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Julian > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> [1] http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html < > > > > > > >> http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> [2] http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html < > > > > > > >> http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:29 PM, P. Taylor Goetz < > > > > > > ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > The maturity model assessment looks good to me, > > though I > > > > > > haven't delved > > > > > > >> deep into it. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > Regarding security issues, since Eagle is a > > > > security-related > > > > > > product I > > > > > > >> would expect there to be a well-defined > process/protocol > > > > that > > > > > > ensured > > > > > > >> vulnerability reports were kept private until patched, > > CVE > > > > > > process, etc. > > > > > > >> Eagle hasn't had any major security issues during > > > > incubation, > > > > > > but should be > > > > > > >> prepared for them after graduation. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > Here [1] [2] are two great resources for > understanding > > > > what > > > > > > is expected > > > > > > >> from an ASF standpoint. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > -Taylor > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > [1] http://www.apache.org/security/ > > > > > > >> > [2] http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:52 PM, Julian Hyde < > > > > jh...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> I reviewed https://cwiki.apache.org/confl > > > > > > >> uence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment < > > > > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confl > uence/display/EAG/Eagle+ > > > Podli > > > > > > >> ng+Maturity+Assessment> and it looks good. > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> Only one issue. Regarding QU30: The dev list and > JIRA > > > > > > (listed in > > > > > > >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html < > > > > > > >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html>) do > > not > > > > > seem > > > > > > >> appropriate places to report security issues, because > > they > > > > are > > > > > > public. Is a > > > > > > >> private channel needed? > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> Can some other mentors please review? > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> I think the consensus is emerging that Eagle is > ready > > > to > > > > > > graduate. The > > > > > > >> community should start taking steps to graduate, > > including > > > > > > agreeing bylaws > > > > > > >> (or deciding that bylaws are not necessary), choosing > an > > > > > > initial PMC chair, > > > > > > >> crafting the resolution for the Board, and starting a > > vote > > > > > > thread. > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> Julian > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >>> On Jul 31, 2016, at 9:05 PM, Edward Zhang < > > > > > > yonzhang2...@apache.org> > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> I have commented some assessment points and we can > > > > remove > > > > > > that once > > > > > > >> after > > > > > > >> >>> they are reviewed. > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> Thanks > > > > > > >> >>> Edward > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Hao Chen < > > > > > h...@apache.org> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> >>>> > > > > > > >> >>>> Thanks Michael for preparing the "Eagle Podling > > > > Maturity > > > > > > Assessment". > > > > > > >> >>>> > > > > > > >> >>>> Eagle community, > > > > > > >> >>>> > > > > > > >> >>>> could you (in particular Mentors & PPMC) please > > help > > > > > > review and > > > > > > >> comment? > > > > > > >> >>>> > > > > > > >> >>>> - Hao > > > > > > >> >>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Michael Wu < > > > > > > mchl....@gmail.com> > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>> Hi guys, > > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>> Following the model Julian cited, we created a > > wiki > > > > page > > > > > > for > > > > > > >> >>>>> self-assessment at: > > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/ > > > confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+ > > > > > > Podlin > > > > > > >> g+Maturity+Assessment > > > > > > >> >>>>> . > > > > > > >> >>>>> Please take a look at it and make your valuable > > > > > judgement > > > > > > and > > > > > > >> >>>> instructions. > > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>> Overall, according to the aspects that the model > > > > values > > > > > > and > > > > > > >> inspects, and > > > > > > >> >>>>> traverse the results listed in the wiki page, > > > > > personally, > > > > > > I think > > > > > > >> Eagle > > > > > > >> >>>> is > > > > > > >> >>>>> approaching the point of graduation, and is > facing > > > the > > > > > > right way > > > > > > >> towards > > > > > > >> >>>>> it. (please correct me if i'm wrong, thanks) > > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>> In this assessment wiki page, status "OK" stands > > for > > > > the > > > > > > all > > > > > > >> resolved > > > > > > >> >>>>> items, status "ON GOING" stands for 2 items that > > > we're > > > > > > striving to > > > > > > >> work > > > > > > >> >>>> on > > > > > > >> >>>>> and will update. Additionally, there is 1 item > > > marked > > > > as > > > > > > "NOT APPLY" > > > > > > >> >>>>> because the "convenient binaries" model seems > not > > > > > fitting > > > > > > for eagle, > > > > > > >> >>>> could > > > > > > >> >>>>> you please verify if it's true and rule RE40 > > > > > > >> >>>>> < > > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/ > > > confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+ > > > > > > Podlin > > > > > > >> g+Maturity+Assessment#EaglePodlingMaturityAssessment > > -RE40 > > > > > > >> >>>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>> could be skipped? > > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>> Any comment and instruction will be appreciated, > > as > > > > all > > > > > > we made or > > > > > > >> will > > > > > > >> >>>>> make is to keep the project running in the right > > > way. > > > > :) > > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>> Michael > > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Hao Chen < > > > > > > h...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > >> >>>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> Thanks very much for bringing up graduation > > > > discussion > > > > > > for Eagle. > > > > > > >> >>>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> Eagle community has almost fully understand how > > to > > > > run > > > > > > an open > > > > > > >> source > > > > > > >> >>>>>> project in apache way. Apache Eagle > (incubating) > > > is > > > > > now > > > > > > open to be > > > > > > >> >>>>>> contributed and adopted by lots of different > > > > > > organizations > > > > > > >> including > > > > > > >> >>>> but > > > > > > >> >>>>>> not limited to eBay, Paypal, Dataguides, > > Yihaodian, > > > > > etc. > > > > > > The > > > > > > >> community > > > > > > >> >>>>> has > > > > > > >> >>>>>> continuously been building and expanding itself > > by > > > > > > sharing and > > > > > > >> talking > > > > > > >> >>>>>> eagle with the word industry in international > > > > > > conferences like > > > > > > >> Hadoop > > > > > > >> >>>>>> Summit, Hadoop Stratus, QCon in San Jose, > London, > > > > > > Dublin, Shanghai, > > > > > > >> >>>>>> Beijing, etc. and also lots of meetups. And the > > > > > > community has > > > > > > >> >>>>> successfully > > > > > > >> >>>>>> release v0.3.0, v0.4.0 and is actively > preparing > > > > v0.5.0 > > > > > > following > > > > > > >> >>>> apache > > > > > > >> >>>>>> releasing process. > > > > > > >> >>>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> To make it clear how close is eagle ready to > > > > graduate, > > > > > > right now > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > >> >>>>>> community is working on preparing an "Eagle > > Podling > > > > > > Maturity > > > > > > >> >>>> Assessment" > > > > > > >> >>>>> to > > > > > > >> >>>>>> measure how mature eagle is and what tasks may > > > remain > > > > > > before > > > > > > >> >>>> graduation, > > > > > > >> >>>>>> will be sent out very soon. > > > > > > >> >>>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> - Hao > > > > > > >> >>>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:25 AM, P. Taylor > > Goetz < > > > > > > >> ptgo...@gmail.com> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > >> >>>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> Graduation is mostly about whether a podling > is > > > > > healthy > > > > > > in terms > > > > > > >> of > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> growing the community and making releases. I > > don't > > > > > > think technical > > > > > > >> >>>>> issues > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> are relevant here. > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> -Taylor > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> On Jul 28, 2016, at 8:12 PM, Tang > > > > > > Jijun(上海_技术部_架构部_大数据平台_唐觊隽) < > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> tangji...@yhd.com> wrote: > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> I don't think eagle is ready to graduate. > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Because > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 1 Code is not stable. > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 2 Project need more unit test. > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Best Wishes > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 唐觊隽 > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech > > > Dept > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang, > > Shanghai > > > > > > (201203) > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> -----邮件原件----- > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 发件人: Edward Zhang [mailto: > yonzhang2012@apache. > > > org] > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 发送时间: 2016年7月29日 5:19 > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 收件人: dev@eagle.incubator.apache.org > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate? > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Yes, we should discuss that on the list, and > > will > > > > go > > > > > > through > > > > > > >> >>>> maturity > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> model first soon. > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Thanks > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Edward > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Julian > Hyde < > > > > > > jh...@apache.org> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> … also want to discuss this with other > > > > > contributors. > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Why not discuss with them on this list? > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Julian > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > > >> >>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
