Ovilia <oviliazh...@gmail.com> 于2020年8月14日周五 下午3:08写道：
> It seems I need to include the initial members and vice president name in > the > vote email. > > Based on previous discussion, I think it might be best if we take all those > initial > PPMC members to be our PMC members if no one objects. > And add our new PPMC members during incubation in the PMC member list and > current committers to be committers of Apache ECharts. > > So the full list of initial members would be: (email in alphabetical order) > c...@apache.org Jaska > clemmakesa...@apache.org Clement Ho > d...@apache.org Houjin Huang > deqin...@apache.org Deqing Li > dexter...@apache.org Jian Cui > error...@apache.org Rui Dong > ke...@apache.org Feng Lin > san...@apache.org Tianjiao Han > she...@apache.org Yi Shen > sushu...@apache.org Shuang Su > susiw...@apache.org Siwen Su > ovi...@apache.org Wenli Zhang > wan...@apache.org Junting Wang > wan...@apache.org Zhongxiang Wang > yi...@apache.org Huang Yixiu > yufen...@apache.org Feng Yu > za...@apache.org Zak Wu > Based on the roaster, you only have 15 PPMC member, https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/echarts, here is 17 people. Which side is right? And, traditionally, mentors should be asked whether to stay in the PMC, default is yes. > > More information on the vice president (chair of the project) from [1]: > > PMC Chairs - who are VPs - serve as normal PMC members, with one vote on > project matters just like other PMC members. The primary duty of a PMC > chair is > providing quarterly reports to the board about the health and status of > their project. > PMC chairs are expected to subscribe to the board@ mailing list, and be > aware of > any board concerns about the project, and are responsible for working with > the PMC > as a whole to address any board concerns. > > As for vice president candidate, I would like to be a volunteer. During > incubation, > I have been helping the community to grow and push things forward. And I > have > been writing incubation report since then. I would like to continue > contributing > and engaging other ones to get involved and help build Apache ECharts a > better > community. > +1 > > Please checkout [1] [2] to know more about PMC and PMC Chairs and you are > welcomed to take part in this discussion so that we can start our vote > soon. > > [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/governance/pmcs.html#legal > [2] https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html > > > > Thanks > > *Ovilia* > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 7:01 PM Ovilia <oviliazh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I will open a vote in the dev mailing list tomorrow if no one opposes. > > > > Thanks > > > > *Ovilia* > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 10:59 AM Ovilia <oviliazh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> We've updated our Website, added links in navbar and translated tools. > >> We keep the custom download page unchanged and may have a further > >> discussion when in general incubator mailing list. > >> > >> Please check and comment if there's a problem remaining. > >> > >> If not, we shall start a community graduation vote [1] in dev@echarts > >> mailing list soon. > >> > >> [1] > >> > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community_graduation_vote > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> *Ovilia* > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 5:57 PM Ovilia <oviliazh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Thanks Max for both choosing ECharts and helping us with graduation. We > >>> really appreciate it. > >>> > >>> Our maturity model is available at [1] and checklist is [2]. > >>> > >>> We are currently discussing potential blocks before we start a vote. So > >>> please > >>> tell us if you find something should be changed. > >>> > >>> [1] > >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ECHARTS/Apache+Maturity+Model+Assessment+for+ECharts > >>> [2] > >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ECHARTS/ECharts+Graduation+Check+List > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> > >>> *Ovilia* > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 12:43 AM Maxime Beauchemin <m...@preset.io> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi all! I recently subscribed to the mailing list and wanted to > >>>> introduce > >>>> myself and offer some help. > >>>> > >>>> My name is Max and I'm the original creator of Apache Airflow (top > >>>> level) > >>>> and Apache Superset (soon to graduate). The Superset community is > >>>> currently > >>>> voting on this Superset Improvement Proposal [SIP-50] Proposal for > using > >>>> ECharts as our main charting library > >>>> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/issues/10418>, looking > >>>> forward to collaborate! > >>>> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/issues/10418> > >>>> > >>>> I wanted to see how we might be able to help ECharts' graduation > >>>> process as > >>>> we kick off our process for Superset. Do you all have a checklist and > >>>> items > >>>> you're looking for help/support? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> > >>>> Max > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 7:43 AM Sheng Qian <quillq...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > > >>>> > I agree with softer way raising concern between ASF official and > >>>> > community, including: > >>>> > - Using different domain other than Apache hosting external content > >>>> > including Gallery, Extension, etc. Marking out something like “this > >>>> is not > >>>> > officially distributed by ASF” just like cookie collecting > >>>> announcement on > >>>> > websites. > >>>> > - For customized build service on browser, keep the service but also > >>>> > stated out builded version can not represent official version and it > >>>> is not > >>>> > for re-distributing. > >>>> > > >>>> > Quill > >>>> > (Actually another Sheng but to avoid confusion I will use my > nickname) > >>>> > > >>>> > > 在 2020年8月3日，20:54，Sheng Wu <wu.sheng.841...@gmail.com> 写道： > >>>> > > > >>>> > > Yi Shen <shenyi....@gmail.com> 于2020年8月3日周一 下午7:21写道： > >>>> > > > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> From my side, this is not the difference. The download source > >>>> package > >>>> > is > >>>> > >>> never been voted is my concern. > >>>> > >>> I know the logically, it is just a subset, but whether there is > a > >>>> > change > >>>> > >> or > >>>> > >>> unexpected files in the final download, we don't know. And no > one > >>>> would > >>>> > >>> check. > >>>> > >>> The whole vote/check process is for manual confirmation about > >>>> that, the > >>>> > >>> source release is 100% following the ASF requirements. > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> I think I get your point. An important reason is the build script > >>>> used > >>>> > on > >>>> > >> the custom builder page is not been checked and voted. > >>>> > >> I agree to remove this page. But there are still about 1.5k > >>>> developers > >>>> > >> using this online tool everyday. > >>>> > >> We should take it carefully to guide these developers to build > from > >>>> > source > >>>> > >> in local. > >>>> > >> > >>>> > > > >>>> > > I think you could start a discussion in the gerneral@incubator, > to > >>>> check > >>>> > > others' ideas. Maybe they have a better solution than removing it. > >>>> > > For that page, I think you could have a terminal simulation on > that > >>>> page, > >>>> > > and guide users on how to use the local command at least. > >>>> > > Or provide a docker image, which including all necessary env, then > >>>> you > >>>> > just > >>>> > > provide one command. Docker image could make the pre-requirement > >>>> env have > >>>> > > been installed correctly. > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > >>>> > > Twitter, wusheng1108 > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> Thanks > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 4:28 PM Sheng Wu < > >>>> wu.sheng.841...@gmail.com> > >>>> > wrote: > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> Yi Shen <shenyi....@gmail.com> 于2020年8月3日周一 下午4:14写道： > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Hi, Sheng > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> The point is, you only vote for the source tar, which includes > >>>> all > >>>> > >>>>> contents, with an ASC and sha512 sign. So, only that is an > >>>> official > >>>> > >>>> apache > >>>> > >>>>> release. > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I want to explain it a bit more. What we thought is bringing > the > >>>> local > >>>> > >>> CLI > >>>> > >>>> to the web. > >>>> > >>>> In which developers can > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 1. Choose a version from the source tar list which have been > >>>> voted. > >>>> > >>>> 2. Download the tar and check sha512 on the browser. > >>>> > >>>> 3. Unzip the tar and build the source into a single js file on > >>>> the > >>>> > >>> browser. > >>>> > >>>> 4. Download the customized built js file. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I guess the main difference between this and the local CLI is > >>>> all the > >>>> > >>>> processes are on the browser. > >>>> > >>>> Please remind us if we missed anything that may cause potential > >>>> risks > >>>> > >> in > >>>> > >>>> it. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> From my side, this is not the difference. The download source > >>>> package > >>>> > is > >>>> > >>> never been voted is my concern. > >>>> > >>> I know the logically, it is just a subset, but whether there is > a > >>>> > change > >>>> > >> or > >>>> > >>> unexpected files in the final download, we don't know. And no > one > >>>> would > >>>> > >>> check. > >>>> > >>> The whole vote/check process is for manual confirmation about > >>>> that, the > >>>> > >>> source release is 100% following the ASF requirements. > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> Sheng Wu 吴晟 > >>>> > >>> Twitter, wusheng1108 > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Regards. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 3:03 PM Sheng Wu < > >>>> wu.sheng.841...@gmail.com> > >>>> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Ovilia <oviliazh...@gmail.com> 于2020年8月3日周一 下午2:52写道： > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> Thanks Sheng for the checking. > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> Here're my thoughts on these issues: > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> 1. I was referring to [1] when checking the navigator. I > >>>> thought it > >>>> > >>>> meant > >>>> > >>>>>> if there's a > >>>> > >>>>>> "Sponsorship" link, it should link to xxx but I didn't > realize > >>>> it > >>>> > >>> means > >>>> > >>>>> the > >>>> > >>>>>> link is > >>>> > >>>>>> mandatory. The following link should be added: > >>>> > >>>>>> Sponsorship, Thanks, Apache Software Foundation. > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Use this to check the potential issue. > >>>> > >>>>> https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/echarts.html > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> 2. Gallery is a place to host ECharts works from the > community, > >>>> > >>>> something > >>>> > >>>>>> similar > >>>> > >>>>>> to jsfiddle or codepen. The server is currently hosted on a > >>>> Baidu > >>>> > >>>> server > >>>> > >>>>>> and we don't > >>>> > >>>>>> have a current plan to donate it to ASF. > >>>> > >>>>>> How about removing the project from the navigator and list it > >>>> > >>> somewhere > >>>> > >>>>> as > >>>> > >>>>>> a > >>>> > >>>>>> community resource? > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Agree, should make it clear, that is a part of > >>>> community/ecosystem. > >>>> > >> And > >>>> > >>>> not > >>>> > >>>>> a part of ASF or Apache release. They just extend the Apache > >>>> ECharts. > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> 3. Theme files are included in the source release [2] and the > >>>> > >> current > >>>> > >>>>>> download-theme page > >>>> > >>>>>> uses convenient binary files hosted on our server. Is this a > >>>> > >> problem? > >>>> > >>>>>> Extensions are mostly made by the community so they are links > >>>> to > >>>> > >>>> related > >>>> > >>>>>> GitHub projects. > >>>> > >>>>>> I think we should put a more clear instruction on the > >>>> > >>>>>> download-extention page [3] that > >>>> > >>>>>> these projects are made by the community. > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> I just prefer to provide a clear statement and catalogs about > >>>> links > >>>> > >> to > >>>> > >>>> 3rd > >>>> > >>>>> party extensions, or Apache release. > >>>> > >>>>> That includes, how and where to report the bug/security issue > >>>> when > >>>> > >>> those > >>>> > >>>>> extensions have issues. > >>>> > >>>>> Also, where should hold their discussion, such as enhancement, > >>>> > >>> iteration. > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> 4. The tools are currently under translation. We didn't put a > >>>> "help > >>>> > >>>>>> translate" note because > >>>> > >>>>>> we have already found the people who wish to translate and it > >>>> > >> should > >>>> > >>> be > >>>> > >>>>>> done within a few > >>>> > >>>>>> weeks. Before then, the English Website will have a "(in > >>>> Chinese)" > >>>> > >>> note > >>>> > >>>>> in > >>>> > >>>>>> the navigator. > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Good to know the progress. Could you check whether they could > >>>> finish > >>>> > >>>> those > >>>> > >>>>> before the graduation discussion in the incubator? I hope to > >>>> ease > >>>> > >> other > >>>> > >>>>> people's concern. > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> 5. The custom build is used to build a release with the least > >>>> > >> source > >>>> > >>>>> files > >>>> > >>>>>> required. > >>>> > >>>>>> I think the biggest concern here is that it is not using the > >>>> source > >>>> > >>>> files > >>>> > >>>>>> voted. > >>>> > >>>>>> How about we change the Web front-end logic to get the source > >>>> file > >>>> > >>> from > >>>> > >>>>>> Apache SVN > >>>> > >>>>>> that has been voted, to build and be downloaded? Does that > >>>> seem to > >>>> > >>> work > >>>> > >>>>> for > >>>> > >>>>>> you? > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> The point is, you only vote for the source tar, which includes > >>>> all > >>>> > >>>>> contents, with an ASC and sha512 sign. So, only that is an > >>>> official > >>>> > >>>> apache > >>>> > >>>>> release. > >>>> > >>>>> If you provide downloads to that only, it is OK. Or, if you > >>>> prefer > >>>> > >> the > >>>> > >>>>> custom mode, do you could provide a local tool to repackage > the > >>>> > >> source > >>>> > >>>>> code? > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#navigation > >>>> > >>>>>> [2] > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/echarts/4.8.0/ > >>>> > >>>>>> [3] https://echarts.apache.org/en/download-extension.html > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> Thanks > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> *Ovilia* > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 11:31 AM Kevin A. McGrail < > >>>> > >>> kmcgr...@apache.org> > >>>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>> I do not know about the links checker but I do remember > there > >>>> was > >>>> > >>>>>>> something cobbled together. All it is doing is testing for > >>>> this > >>>> > >>>>> policy: > >>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#navigation > >>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>> On 8/2/2020 10:56 PM, Sheng Wu wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi, Ovilia > >>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>> I don't remember, but there is a website link check in the > >>>> > >>>> incubator, > >>>> > >>>>>>> does > >>>> > >>>>>>>> anyone/mentor remember this? > >>>> > >>>>>>>> From I read from your website, questions > >>>> > >>>>>>>> 1. There are some links missing. You could compare it with > >>>> > >>>>>>>> http://skywalking.apache.org/ links menu. > >>>> > >>>>>>>> 2. There is a menu, called Gallary Chinese. What is that? > >>>> From > >>>> > >> my > >>>> > >>>>>>> reading, > >>>> > >>>>>>>> it seems more like extensions/plugins? Who owns (s) this > >>>> repo? > >>>> > >>>>>>>> 3. Download part, theme, and extension, what are the > >>>> > >> differences > >>>> > >>>>>> between > >>>> > >>>>>>>> these two and Gallary? And I don't remember there is any > >>>> > >> official > >>>> > >>>>>> release > >>>> > >>>>>>>> process(vote/license check, etc.) about these. Could you > >>>> > >> clarify > >>>> > >>>> what > >>>> > >>>>>>> they > >>>> > >>>>>>>> are? > >>>> > >>>>>>>> 4. About the tool(s). From my understanding, they are > >>>> > >>> configuration > >>>> > >>>>>>>> generation for ECharts, why they are Chinese only, and do > you > >>>> > >>> have > >>>> > >>>>> open > >>>> > >>>>>>>> process about how to contribute on these tools? > >>>> > >>>>>>>> 5. I noticed `Option 3: Custom Build` on the website > download > >>>> > >>> page, > >>>> > >>>>> how > >>>> > >>>>>>>> this works? I am a little worried about it breaks the ASF > >>>> > >> release > >>>> > >>>>>>> process. > >>>> > >>>>>>>> Because, the source release(js mostly is not source, no > >>>> binary) > >>>> > >>> is > >>>> > >>>>>> never > >>>> > >>>>>>>> being voted. I could get the points, seems you provide the > >>>> > >> users > >>>> > >>> to > >>>> > >>>>>> get a > >>>> > >>>>>>>> subset of the entire source tar. But the unvoted source > tars > >>>> > >> make > >>>> > >>>> me > >>>> > >>>>>>> unsure > >>>> > >>>>>>>> whether this is acceptable in the ASF. What other mentors > >>>> > >> think? > >>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>> Sheng Wu 吴晟 > >>>> > >>>>>>>> Twitter, wusheng1108 > >>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>> Ovilia <oviliazh...@gmail.com> 于2020年8月3日周一 上午10:25写道： > >>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> Dear mentors, > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> Can you help us review the graduation related documents > and > >>>> > >> see > >>>> > >>> if > >>>> > >>>>>>> there is > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> something > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> to be improved? > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> *Ovilia* > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 11:59 AM siwen su < > >>>> susiw...@gmail.com> > >>>> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi all: > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I have nothing to say about website, It apply all rules > of > >>>> > >>>> Apache, > >>>> > >>>>>> and > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> most > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> importantly, add some very useful features. > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> About reserving initial PPMC qualification, since I > haven't > >>>> > >>> work > >>>> > >>>>> with > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> them, > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> but I read about the history of ECharts, Mr Lin Zhifeng > and > >>>> > >> Mr > >>>> > >>>> Dong > >>>> > >>>>>> Rui > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> had > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> made remarkable contributions to ECharts, even thought > they > >>>> > >>>> haven't > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> contribute during incubating but It can't change the fact > >>>> > >> that > >>>> > >>>> they > >>>> > >>>>>>> have > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> laid the foundation for ECharts, so naming they as PMC in > >>>> > >>> future > >>>> > >>>>>> would > >>>> > >>>>>>> be > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> reasonable > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> As for the password, distribute it via private mail list > >>>> > >>> wasn't a > >>>> > >>>>>> great > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> idea,, like @zhongxiang mentioned, someone else would > >>>> "steal" > >>>> > >>> it, > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> especially we have discussed on dev mail list which lots > of > >>>> > >>>> people > >>>> > >>>>>> know > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> how > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> passport would be distributed. > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Best regard > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Siwen Su > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Zhongxiang Wang <wan...@apache.org> 于2020年7月30日周四 > >>>> 下午12:57写道： > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> 1. The current website is following the guide of podling > >>>> > >>> website > >>>> > >>>>> and > >>>> > >>>>>>> it > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> is > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> all right for me. > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> 2. Sending an important private key or password on email > >>>> > >>> without > >>>> > >>>>> any > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> encryption is obviously so unsafe. Some email clients > >>>> don’t > >>>> > >>>>> encrypt > >>>> > >>>>>>> the > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> email content by default and this may lead to a leak of > >>>> > >>> content > >>>> > >>>> if > >>>> > >>>>>>> it’s > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> intercepted during the transmission. So it’s better to > >>>> > >> enable > >>>> > >>>>> email > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> encryption in email client and encrypt the raw password > or > >>>> > >> any > >>>> > >>>>> other > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> important information in the content of the email by > some > >>>> > >>>> advanced > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> patterns > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> difficult to crack before sending to a mailing list or > >>>> > >>>> elsewhere. > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> 3. As for the early PMCs and committers, we should > always > >>>> > >> keep > >>>> > >>>> the > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> founder > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Zhifeng Lin as PMC, who is so essential to ECharts > >>>> project. > >>>> > >>> As I > >>>> > >>>>>> know, > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> he’s > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> been helping silently ECharts project improve and > develop > >>>> by > >>>> > >>> his > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> professional suggestions. > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Zhongxiang Wang. > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On 2020/07/27 05:07:23, Ovilia <oviliazh...@gmail.com> > >>>> > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Apache ECharts (incubating) has learned and grown a lot > >>>> > >> since > >>>> > >>>> our > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> incubation in Jan > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2018. Now, I'm glad to call on a discussion about > whether > >>>> > >> we > >>>> > >>>> are > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> ready > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> for > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> graduation and > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> what remains to be done. Hopefully, after this > >>>> discussion, > >>>> > >> we > >>>> > >>>> can > >>>> > >>>>>> set > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> the > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> status to be > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> "near graduation" in the monthly report. > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Updates since incubation: > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> - 2 new PPMCs (and another has completed the vote and > >>>> > >>>> undergoing > >>>> > >>>>>> the > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> process) and 7 > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> new committers were elected and joined the community > [1] > >>>> > >> and > >>>> > >>>> now > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> we have committers working for more than 6 different > >>>> > >>> companies. > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> - Our mailing list [2] is very active and we have 79 > >>>> people > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> subscribed > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> to > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> it. > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> - Released 8 versions by 2 release managers [3]; > release > >>>> > >>> guide > >>>> > >>>> is > >>>> > >>>>>> at > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [4] > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> - 73 people have contributed to the project during > >>>> > >> incubation > >>>> > >>>> [9] > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> - Assessment of the maturity model is available at [5] > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> - Branding issues have been solved and name searching > has > >>>> > >>> been > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> completed > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> [6] > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Other things we need to discuss: > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Website > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> We updated our Website [7] content, logo, document, and > >>>> so > >>>> > >> on > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> according > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Apache rules > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> and hopefully, it's following all requirements. You may > >>>> > >> help > >>>> > >>>>> check > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> the > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> rules [8] and discuss > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> the ones that you think need to change. > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Sponsored CDN > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> We have updated the Website with a sponsored CDN to > >>>> improve > >>>> > >>>> speed > >>>> > >>>>>> in > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> China > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> and > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> created an account for all PPMCs. But we are not sure > how > >>>> > >> we > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> should distribute the > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> password of that account? Should we send the password > on > >>>> > >> the > >>>> > >>>>>> private > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> mailing list? Is that safe enough? > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Also, the releasing script in the release guide [4] > >>>> depends > >>>> > >>> on > >>>> > >>>>> the > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> password > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> of the CDN > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> private key. How should we distribute it? > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 3. PMCs and Committers > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> We have to discuss what to do with the initial PPMCs > that > >>>> > >> had > >>>> > >>>> no > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> clear > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> contribution to > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> the project during incubation. We should decide on each > >>>> of > >>>> > >>>> them, > >>>> > >>>>> do > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> we > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> wish > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> to make > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> him a PMC or Committer or neither. Basically, it's > >>>> decided > >>>> > >> by > >>>> > >>>> the > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> project, > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> so please talk about how you feel about this. > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> a. Lin Zhifeng https://github.com/kener > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> b. Dong Rui https://github.com/erik168 > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> c. Huang Houjin https://github.com/chriswong > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://echarts.apache.org/en/committers.html > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > >>>> > >>> https://lists.apache.org/list.html?dev@echarts.apache.org > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [3] > >>>> > >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/echarts/ > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [4] > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > > >>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ECHARTS/Apache+ECharts+Release+Guide > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > > >>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ECHARTS/Apache+ECharts+Release+Guide > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [5] > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > > >>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ECHARTS/Apache+Maturity+Model+Assessment+for+ECharts > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [6] > >>>> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-153 > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [7] http://echarts.apache.org/ > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [8] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/sites.html > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [9] Using `git shortlog -sn --since="20 Jan, 2018"` on > >>>> the > >>>> > >>>> master > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> branch > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> and merging > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> alias > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Ovilia* > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >>>> dev-unsubscr...@echarts.apache.org > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: > >>>> > >> dev-h...@echarts.apache.org > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>> > >>>>>>> Kevin A. McGrail > >>>> > >>>>>>> kmcgr...@apache.org > >>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>> Member, Apache Software Foundation > >>>> > >>>>>>> Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project > >>>> > >>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171 > >>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> > >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@echarts.apache.org > >>>> > >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: > dev-h...@echarts.apache.org > >>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> > >>>> Yi Shen > >>>> > >>>> Apache ECharts(incubating) PPMC > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> -- > >>>> > >> Yi Shen > >>>> > >> Apache ECharts(incubating) PPMC > >>>> > >> > >>>> > > >>>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@echarts.apache.org > >>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@echarts.apache.org > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > >>> >
