Marcel Offermans wrote:
I'd prefer a name that reflects the main features of this logger. Something
like plugable logger, or log adapter. We have not made up these type of names
for our other components, so why start here?
That is not true, we have iPOJO, for example, but I supposed we could
have called it scr.alternative.using.bytecode.manipulation. ;-)
The reason why this has not really been an issue up until now is that we
don't have multiple implementations of anything. So, this is the first
real case of that. From my perspective, names do make sense, but it does
make sense too if we can organize around their functionality, which is
why I suggested "log.flogger" for the directory name, not just "flogger".
Of course, even maintaining this could be difficult if we started to get
lots of different implementations, so one could argue that we should
just switch naming our subprojects. But I don't think it has come to
that yet.
-> richard
Then again, I don't really mind. :)
Greetings, Marcel
-----Original Message-----
On Monday 28 July 2008 08:00, Richard S. Hall wrote:
such as Flogger, for Felix logger,
+1 for Flogger.
