On Monday 28 July 2008 14:33, Marcel Offermans wrote: > I'd prefer a name that reflects the main features of this logger. Something > like plugable logger, or log adapter.
Main feature; Interception of calls to many/most existing Log framework in legacy code that is OSGi-enabled without being OSGi dependent. Current detail; Uses Log4J behind the scenes, and inadvertently exposes the Log4J properties configuration format via ManagedService. Perhaps not optimal, but a compromise made 2-3 years ago. Suggestions; log.flogger (I love that name...) log.enterprise log.general Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
