I'd go with a 2.5.0 since it's been a canceled vote and the stage has been dumped. Less confusing then to skip a 2.5.0 version, which might confuse others even more :)
regards, Achim 2014-06-23 14:46 GMT+02:00 Stuart McCulloch <mccu...@gmail.com>: > Just to clarify, the 2.5.0 release has been cancelled due to this bug: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/users@felix.apache.org/msg15423.html > > which affects several use-cases (including ones that people new to OSGi > would use). > > The staging repository was dropped and the tag was removed - but I was > thinking about staging the next build as 2.5.1 (as versions are cheap) > rather than confuse people. > > But if people feel strongly about re-using versions while staging (hence > this thread to poll opinion) then I’ll re-stage the fixed build as 2.5.0 > > On 23 Jun 2014, at 13:42, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > > > I think I didn't follow you, but if you didn't promote the release on > Nexus, the artifacts won't be released, so the current staging 2.5.0 won't > be promoted. > > So, you can drop the staging repo, remove the tag, fix your issue and > redo the release again. > > > > If you already promoted the staging repo, I agree with you. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On 06/23/2014 02:30 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > >> On 23 Jun 2014, at 13:28, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Stuart, > >>> > >>> No problem, but I don't see why to cancel the 2.5.0 release. When we > cancel, it's especially to remove the tag, and redo the release with the > same version number. > >> > >> Do you really want a plugin version out there that doesn’t work for the > basic case? This would be a really bad experience for users who didn’t > know that 2.5.0 was a bad release. > >> > >>> Regards > >>> JB > >>> > >>> On 06/23/2014 02:13 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> Mark found a bug in the staged maven-bundle-plugin 2.5.0 release, so > I’ve cancelled the release vote and fixed it in trunk. > >>>> > >>>> I’m considering staging the next release as 2.5.1 rather than > re-using 2.5.0 (and having to change the tag in svn, etc.) … any > thoughts/preferences? > >>>> > >>>> — > >>>> Cheers, Stuart > >>>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >>> jbono...@apache.org > >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >> > > > > -- > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > jbono...@apache.org > > http://blog.nanthrax.net > > Talend - http://www.talend.com > > -- Apache Member Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
