OK - general consensus appears to be to re-use 2.5.0, so I’ll defer to that
On 23 Jun 2014, at 13:49, Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I'd go with a 2.5.0 since it's been a canceled vote and the stage has been > dumped. > Less confusing then to skip a 2.5.0 version, which might confuse others > even more :) > > regards, Achim > > > 2014-06-23 14:46 GMT+02:00 Stuart McCulloch <mccu...@gmail.com>: > >> Just to clarify, the 2.5.0 release has been cancelled due to this bug: >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/users@felix.apache.org/msg15423.html >> >> which affects several use-cases (including ones that people new to OSGi >> would use). >> >> The staging repository was dropped and the tag was removed - but I was >> thinking about staging the next build as 2.5.1 (as versions are cheap) >> rather than confuse people. >> >> But if people feel strongly about re-using versions while staging (hence >> this thread to poll opinion) then I’ll re-stage the fixed build as 2.5.0 >> >> On 23 Jun 2014, at 13:42, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: >> >>> I think I didn't follow you, but if you didn't promote the release on >> Nexus, the artifacts won't be released, so the current staging 2.5.0 won't >> be promoted. >>> So, you can drop the staging repo, remove the tag, fix your issue and >> redo the release again. >>> >>> If you already promoted the staging repo, I agree with you. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 06/23/2014 02:30 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote: >>>> On 23 Jun 2014, at 13:28, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Stuart, >>>>> >>>>> No problem, but I don't see why to cancel the 2.5.0 release. When we >> cancel, it's especially to remove the tag, and redo the release with the >> same version number. >>>> >>>> Do you really want a plugin version out there that doesn’t work for the >> basic case? This would be a really bad experience for users who didn’t >> know that 2.5.0 was a bad release. >>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On 06/23/2014 02:13 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Mark found a bug in the staged maven-bundle-plugin 2.5.0 release, so >> I’ve cancelled the release vote and fixed it in trunk. >>>>>> >>>>>> I’m considering staging the next release as 2.5.1 rather than >> re-using 2.5.0 (and having to change the tag in svn, etc.) … any >> thoughts/preferences? >>>>>> >>>>>> — >>>>>> Cheers, Stuart >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> jbono...@apache.org >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> >> > > > -- > > Apache Member > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & > Project Lead > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> > > Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master