OK - general consensus appears to be to re-use 2.5.0, so I’ll defer to that

On 23 Jun 2014, at 13:49, Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> I'd go with a 2.5.0 since it's been a canceled vote and the stage has been
> dumped.
> Less confusing then to skip a 2.5.0 version, which might confuse others
> even more :)
> 
> regards, Achim
> 
> 
> 2014-06-23 14:46 GMT+02:00 Stuart McCulloch <mccu...@gmail.com>:
> 
>> Just to clarify, the 2.5.0 release has been cancelled due to this bug:
>> 
>>        http://www.mail-archive.com/users@felix.apache.org/msg15423.html
>> 
>> which affects several use-cases (including ones that people new to OSGi
>> would use).
>> 
>> The staging repository was dropped and the tag was removed - but I was
>> thinking about staging the next build as 2.5.1 (as versions are cheap)
>> rather than confuse people.
>> 
>> But if people feel strongly about re-using versions while staging (hence
>> this thread to poll opinion) then I’ll re-stage the fixed build as 2.5.0
>> 
>> On 23 Jun 2014, at 13:42, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> I think I didn't follow you, but if you didn't promote the release on
>> Nexus, the artifacts won't be released, so the current staging 2.5.0 won't
>> be promoted.
>>> So, you can drop the staging repo, remove the tag, fix your issue and
>> redo the release again.
>>> 
>>> If you already promoted the staging repo, I agree with you.
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> 
>>> On 06/23/2014 02:30 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
>>>> On 23 Jun 2014, at 13:28, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Stuart,
>>>>> 
>>>>> No problem, but I don't see why to cancel the 2.5.0 release. When we
>> cancel, it's especially to remove the tag, and redo the release with the
>> same version number.
>>>> 
>>>> Do you really want a plugin version out there that doesn’t work for the
>> basic case?  This would be a really bad experience for users who didn’t
>> know that 2.5.0 was a bad release.
>>>> 
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 06/23/2014 02:13 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Mark found a bug in the staged maven-bundle-plugin 2.5.0 release, so
>> I’ve cancelled the release vote and fixed it in trunk.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I’m considering staging the next release as 2.5.1 rather than
>> re-using 2.5.0 (and having to change the tag in svn, etc.) … any
>> thoughts/preferences?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> —
>>>>>> Cheers, Stuart
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>> jbono...@apache.org
>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbono...@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Apache Member
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
> Project Lead
> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
> 
> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master

Reply via email to