Sorry, I meant we use OpenJDK 17... /Bengt
Den fre 4 mars 2022 kl 10:13 skrev Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>: > This is really interesting. We are very dependent on iPojo but we need to > move on to newer Java. We use OpenJDK 18 now. Even if iPojo won't be > maintained as in new features, it would be very valuable to have the > existing functionality work in newer Java versions. > > /Bengt Rodehav > > Den fre 4 mars 2022 kl 07:06 skrev Alexander Shaklein (Jira) < > j...@apache.org>: > >> >> [ >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel >> ] >> >> Alexander Shaklein updated FELIX-6502: >> -------------------------------------- >> Summary: IPOJO Java 11+ support (was: Java 11+ support) >> >> > IPOJO Java 11+ support >> > ---------------------- >> > >> > Key: FELIX-6502 >> > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6502 >> > Project: Felix >> > Issue Type: Improvement >> > Components: iPOJO >> > Reporter: Alexander Shaklein >> > Priority: Minor >> > >> > I have made some changes in ipojo projects to work in java 11+. >> > The were successfully tested on java 11, 16. Should i make a PR or i >> can work with fork alone? >> >> >> >> -- >> This message was sent by Atlassian Jira >> (v8.20.1#820001) >> >
