I am on Windows - hope it is possible to build iPojo on Windows. /Bengt
Den fre 11 mars 2022 kl 10:19 skrev Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>: > I downloaded the entire Felix code base for this commit. I then attempted > to build iPojo with "mvn clean install" and got the following error: > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal > org.codehaus.mojo:ianal-maven-plugin:1.0-alpha-1:verify-legal-files > (default) on project org.apache.felix.ipojo.metadata: Execution default of > goal org.codehaus.mojo:ianal-maven-plugin:1.0-alpha-1:verify-legal-files > failed: Unable to make private java.io.File(java.lang.String,java.io.File) > accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.io" to unnamed module > @214e3185 -> [Help 1] > > I assume I built it the wrong way. Can anyone advise me how to build Felix > (or just iPojo)? > > /Bengt > > Den ons 9 mars 2022 kl 15:55 skrev Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>: > >> I haven't done this before. I was hoping someone had newly built iPojo >> jar's I could test. >> >> /Bengt >> >> Den ons 9 mars 2022 kl 15:41 skrev Karl Pauls <karlpa...@gmail.com>: >> >>> There is a PR here: https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/pull/129 >>> >>> So I imaging you would apply it locally and build the ipojo subproject. >>> >>> regards, >>> >>> Karl >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 3:27 PM Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > I can try. Not familiar with how to create a working JAR from the >>> > information in the JIRA though. Alexander, could you build the >>> necessary >>> > jar's for me and instruct me what dependencies I should use? >>> > >>> > /Bengt >>> > >>> > Den fre 4 mars 2022 kl 10:58 skrev Karl Pauls <karlpa...@gmail.com>: >>> > >>> > > Yes, I agree - I didn't have time yet to review the path. >>> > > >>> > > Could you have a look and see if it is working for you? >>> > > >>> > > regards, >>> > > >>> > > Karl >>> > > >>> > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 10:14 AM Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com> >>> wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > This is really interesting. We are very dependent on iPojo but we >>> need to >>> > > > move on to newer Java. We use OpenJDK 18 now. Even if iPojo won't >>> be >>> > > > maintained as in new features, it would be very valuable to have >>> the >>> > > > existing functionality work in newer Java versions. >>> > > > >>> > > > /Bengt Rodehav >>> > > > >>> > > > Den fre 4 mars 2022 kl 07:06 skrev Alexander Shaklein (Jira) < >>> > > > j...@apache.org>: >>> > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > [ >>> > > > > >>> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel >>> > > > > ] >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Alexander Shaklein updated FELIX-6502: >>> > > > > -------------------------------------- >>> > > > > Summary: IPOJO Java 11+ support (was: Java 11+ support) >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > IPOJO Java 11+ support >>> > > > > > ---------------------- >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Key: FELIX-6502 >>> > > > > > URL: >>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6502 >>> > > > > > Project: Felix >>> > > > > > Issue Type: Improvement >>> > > > > > Components: iPOJO >>> > > > > > Reporter: Alexander Shaklein >>> > > > > > Priority: Minor >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > I have made some changes in ipojo projects to work in java 11+. >>> > > > > > The were successfully tested on java 11, 16. Should i make a >>> PR or i >>> > > can >>> > > > > work with fork alone? >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > -- >>> > > > > This message was sent by Atlassian Jira >>> > > > > (v8.20.1#820001) >>> > > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > Karl Pauls >>> > > karlpa...@gmail.com >>> > > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Karl Pauls >>> karlpa...@gmail.com >>> >>
