Hi all First as you can see in PR there were only made changes in manipulator project. Proposed changes allow to use maven-ipojo-plugin when building modules with jdk11+. Besides after latest changes the same version now works on jdk8 and jdk11+ with no problems. Speaking to me all what i was need to rebuild - is manipulator project. Just got to folder felix-dev/ipojo/manipulator and execute *maven clean install* Project successfully builds using jdk8 and jdk11. (Btw, even if you build it using jdk8 it will properly work on jdk11+)
Regards, Alexander пт, 11 мар. 2022 г. в 19:30, Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>: > I am on Windows - hope it is possible to build iPojo on Windows. > > /Bengt > > Den fre 11 mars 2022 kl 10:19 skrev Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>: > > > I downloaded the entire Felix code base for this commit. I then attempted > > to build iPojo with "mvn clean install" and got the following error: > > > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal > > org.codehaus.mojo:ianal-maven-plugin:1.0-alpha-1:verify-legal-files > > (default) on project org.apache.felix.ipojo.metadata: Execution default > of > > goal org.codehaus.mojo:ianal-maven-plugin:1.0-alpha-1:verify-legal-files > > failed: Unable to make private > java.io.File(java.lang.String,java.io.File) > > accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.io" to unnamed module > > @214e3185 -> [Help 1] > > > > I assume I built it the wrong way. Can anyone advise me how to build > Felix > > (or just iPojo)? > > > > /Bengt > > > > Den ons 9 mars 2022 kl 15:55 skrev Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>: > > > >> I haven't done this before. I was hoping someone had newly built iPojo > >> jar's I could test. > >> > >> /Bengt > >> > >> Den ons 9 mars 2022 kl 15:41 skrev Karl Pauls <karlpa...@gmail.com>: > >> > >>> There is a PR here: https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/pull/129 > >>> > >>> So I imaging you would apply it locally and build the ipojo subproject. > >>> > >>> regards, > >>> > >>> Karl > >>> > >>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 3:27 PM Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com> > wrote: > >>> > > >>> > I can try. Not familiar with how to create a working JAR from the > >>> > information in the JIRA though. Alexander, could you build the > >>> necessary > >>> > jar's for me and instruct me what dependencies I should use? > >>> > > >>> > /Bengt > >>> > > >>> > Den fre 4 mars 2022 kl 10:58 skrev Karl Pauls <karlpa...@gmail.com>: > >>> > > >>> > > Yes, I agree - I didn't have time yet to review the path. > >>> > > > >>> > > Could you have a look and see if it is working for you? > >>> > > > >>> > > regards, > >>> > > > >>> > > Karl > >>> > > > >>> > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 10:14 AM Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > > > > >>> > > > This is really interesting. We are very dependent on iPojo but we > >>> need to > >>> > > > move on to newer Java. We use OpenJDK 18 now. Even if iPojo won't > >>> be > >>> > > > maintained as in new features, it would be very valuable to have > >>> the > >>> > > > existing functionality work in newer Java versions. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > /Bengt Rodehav > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Den fre 4 mars 2022 kl 07:06 skrev Alexander Shaklein (Jira) < > >>> > > > j...@apache.org>: > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > [ > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel > >>> > > > > ] > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > Alexander Shaklein updated FELIX-6502: > >>> > > > > -------------------------------------- > >>> > > > > Summary: IPOJO Java 11+ support (was: Java 11+ support) > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > IPOJO Java 11+ support > >>> > > > > > ---------------------- > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Key: FELIX-6502 > >>> > > > > > URL: > >>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6502 > >>> > > > > > Project: Felix > >>> > > > > > Issue Type: Improvement > >>> > > > > > Components: iPOJO > >>> > > > > > Reporter: Alexander Shaklein > >>> > > > > > Priority: Minor > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > I have made some changes in ipojo projects to work in java > 11+. > >>> > > > > > The were successfully tested on java 11, 16. Should i make a > >>> PR or i > >>> > > can > >>> > > > > work with fork alone? > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > -- > >>> > > > > This message was sent by Atlassian Jira > >>> > > > > (v8.20.1#820001) > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > -- > >>> > > Karl Pauls > >>> > > karlpa...@gmail.com > >>> > > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Karl Pauls > >>> karlpa...@gmail.com > >>> > >> >
