Yes, I agree - I didn't have time yet to review the path. Could you have a look and see if it is working for you?
regards, Karl On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 10:14 AM Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com> wrote: > > This is really interesting. We are very dependent on iPojo but we need to > move on to newer Java. We use OpenJDK 18 now. Even if iPojo won't be > maintained as in new features, it would be very valuable to have the > existing functionality work in newer Java versions. > > /Bengt Rodehav > > Den fre 4 mars 2022 kl 07:06 skrev Alexander Shaklein (Jira) < > j...@apache.org>: > > > > > [ > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel > > ] > > > > Alexander Shaklein updated FELIX-6502: > > -------------------------------------- > > Summary: IPOJO Java 11+ support (was: Java 11+ support) > > > > > IPOJO Java 11+ support > > > ---------------------- > > > > > > Key: FELIX-6502 > > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6502 > > > Project: Felix > > > Issue Type: Improvement > > > Components: iPOJO > > > Reporter: Alexander Shaklein > > > Priority: Minor > > > > > > I have made some changes in ipojo projects to work in java 11+. > > > The were successfully tested on java 11, 16. Should i make a PR or i can > > work with fork alone? > > > > > > > > -- > > This message was sent by Atlassian Jira > > (v8.20.1#820001) > > -- Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com
