Ultimately I think github is the way to go. If that can't work, the other
choice is for infra to create a repo per committer (github model).
I guess you meant: to create a repo per committer's project (github model).
-Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Michael A. Labriola
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 6:49 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] How do we want to handle Whiteboard?
I don't think it would be possible to use github for the "official"
whiteboards as it brings up a number of issues for infra and the ASF
ie knowing who contributed, licensing issues etc etc basically the
normal issues for bit of donated code.
Ultimately I think github is the way to go. If that can't work, the other
choice is for infra to create a repo per committer (github model). Git's
strength is that of a distributed version control system. We keep trying to
centralize it. The whiteboard don't belong in the same repo as the core code
in the git model IMO.
Regarding official whiteboards and github, its interesting. In some ways,
IMO, it's better for the ASF. In this way nothing enters an ASF repo until
it officially becomes part of the project and its better for me as I can
quickly play and just commit code without worrying about headers, etc. Then
we deal with those things prior to an import.
Mike
