Can we do it in two pieces? The first part is the subject of this email: Can we get the "develop" branch as the default and the graphs showing the "develop" branch activity? I guess that could also include removal of the "trunk" if that's old SVN stuff. I think we have consensus on this?
The second part is about pull requests, and I think that will require some experimentation and will take longer to settle. Did I miss a topic? Anyway, if you agree, can you take care of that first part? Thanks, -Alex On 5/13/13 11:17 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> Om, you seem to know what needs to be done, can you make sure the required >> changes get made? >> >> > I will as soon as we arrive at consensus here. Infra requests usually take > time and I want to get what we want in one go :-) > > Thanks, > Om > > >> >> On 5/13/13 11:10 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Other than that we should not spend more time on this 'issue'. >>>>> This is an issue because it's seen by the wider community. I agree it's >>>> mostly >>>>> irrelevant to active committers but it is an issue for someone who does >>>> a pull >>>>> request and that request is ignored for several months. It an issue >>>> because >>>>> github says no changes have happened in the project for 3 months (and >>>> people >>>>> tweet about it) when the actual fact is that changes happen every other >>>> day. >>>> A quick tour of search results shows that there is no way to get the >> graph >>>> to show a branch >>> >>> >>> This is a quirk of GitHub. Once the default branch is changed to >>> 'develop', the graphs will start showing activity for develop. >>> >>> >>> >>>> but implies that we will see all the last several months of >>>> activity in the graph when we merge the next release with trunk/master. >>>> Maybe that's one reason Cordova releases every month, or at least it is >> a >>>> side benefit? >>>> >>>> So let's see if we can get this next release out ASAP. And then if >> GitHub >>>> refuses to show activity then I would vote to not use GitHub as a >> mirror. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Alex Harui >>>> Flex SDK Team >>>> Adobe Systems, Inc. >>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >>>> >>>> >> >> -- >> Alex Harui >> Flex SDK Team >> Adobe Systems, Inc. >> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >> >> -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
