On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Can we do it in two pieces? The first part is the subject of this email: > Can we get the "develop" branch as the default and the graphs showing the > "develop" branch activity? I guess you meant this for flex-sdk. What about the others? Maybe we should list them and get everything set up properly at the same time. > I guess that could also include removal of the > "trunk" if that's old SVN stuff. I think we have consensus on this? > Not sure what you mean by 'removal of trunk'. If we remove it from our apache git repo, it will automatically be removed from the GitHub mirror during the next sync. We dont need to ask Infra for this. That brings us to the question - do we really want to remove the 'trunk' branch? That is where the SVN history is (we were doing active development on the svn trunk for a period of time) We can remove it if we are okay with going back to our old, now read-only SVN repo for any related history. > > The second part is about pull requests, and I think that will require some > experimentation and will take longer to settle. > > Did I miss a topic? Anyway, if you agree, can you take care of that first > part? > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 5/13/13 11:17 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > >> Om, you seem to know what needs to be done, can you make sure the > required > >> changes get made? > >> > >> > > I will as soon as we arrive at consensus here. Infra requests usually > take > > time and I want to get what we want in one go :-) > > > > Thanks, > > Om > > > > > >> > >> On 5/13/13 11:10 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Other than that we should not spend more time on this 'issue'. > >>>>> This is an issue because it's seen by the wider community. I agree > it's > >>>> mostly > >>>>> irrelevant to active committers but it is an issue for someone who > does > >>>> a pull > >>>>> request and that request is ignored for several months. It an issue > >>>> because > >>>>> github says no changes have happened in the project for 3 months (and > >>>> people > >>>>> tweet about it) when the actual fact is that changes happen every > other > >>>> day. > >>>> A quick tour of search results shows that there is no way to get the > >> graph > >>>> to show a branch > >>> > >>> > >>> This is a quirk of GitHub. Once the default branch is changed to > >>> 'develop', the graphs will start showing activity for develop. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> but implies that we will see all the last several months of > >>>> activity in the graph when we merge the next release with > trunk/master. > >>>> Maybe that's one reason Cordova releases every month, or at least it > is > >> a > >>>> side benefit? > >>>> > >>>> So let's see if we can get this next release out ASAP. And then if > >> GitHub > >>>> refuses to show activity then I would vote to not use GitHub as a > >> mirror. > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Alex Harui > >>>> Flex SDK Team > >>>> Adobe Systems, Inc. > >>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> -- > >> Alex Harui > >> Flex SDK Team > >> Adobe Systems, Inc. > >> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > >> > >> > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > >
