On Nov 19, 2013 12:51 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > > On 11/18/13 12:19 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > > >I'm clear. Sounds awesome! Let me know when the ant script is done, > >I'll work it into a Jenkins job so we get a fresh overlay for each > >commit to either Falcon(Jx) or FlexJS. Another advantage, besides > >being always up to date, is that this way there will be a fixed URL > >pointing to the latest and greatest overlay. > I checked in enough ant stuff to make the 'ant release' binary package be > equivalent to the FlexJSOverlay. > > Doing so exposed a couple of things: > 1) FB won't accept an SDK if its version number in > flex-sdk-description.xml is less than 4. So, I think FlexJS may have to > start with version 4.0.0.
That's interesting. How about the other IDEs? Should we reach out to them? If we have to go this route, we could probably start it with 5.0. That would have a nice ring to it. Thanks, Om > > 2) A true Apache release package should more closely match the repo > structure. So, my next task is to update the ant and other scripts so > that the packages look more like Apache releases. I won't be moving any > .AS or .JS files, just modifying the build.xml and .sh files. I don't > know if that will affect any Jenkins job or not so it might be worth > holding off until I get this fixed up. > > FWIW, after that, I'm going to try to integrate a port of basictests. > > -Alex >
