Well, we keep the honorary major version 4 and do the actual numbering with the minor version and the build number. We start with 4.0.1 for alpha 1 and work our way up to 4.1.0 for the first release.
EdB On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 11/20/13 12:43 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On Nov 19, 2013 12:51 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 11/18/13 12:19 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >>> >>> >I'm clear. Sounds awesome! Let me know when the ant script is done, >>> >I'll work it into a Jenkins job so we get a fresh overlay for each >>> >commit to either Falcon(Jx) or FlexJS. Another advantage, besides >>> >being always up to date, is that this way there will be a fixed URL >>> >pointing to the latest and greatest overlay. >>> I checked in enough ant stuff to make the 'ant release' binary package >>>be >>> equivalent to the FlexJSOverlay. >>> >>> Doing so exposed a couple of things: >>> 1) FB won't accept an SDK if its version number in >>> flex-sdk-description.xml is less than 4. So, I think FlexJS may have to >>> start with version 4.0.0. >> >>That's interesting. How about the other IDEs? Should we reach out to >>them? > Feel free to do so. I keep hoping the IntelliJ folks would jump in. >> >>If we have to go this route, we could probably start it with 5.0. That >>would have a nice ring to it. > I guess, but my main concern is that the first release should be a 0.x to > make it more clear that this is new stuff. The title in the description > can say anything, just the version tag matters, AFAICT. > > -Alex > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
