On Dec 9, 2013 10:56 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> Ah, that thread looked like it was a year old.  Did you work around it or
> just stop working on it?

I just stopped working on it because I hit a dead end.  I was clueless as
to how to fix it.

>
> Other than checking the path, I don't have any ideas to try at the moment.
>
> On your Azure VM, if you manually launch the compiler from Windows command
> prompt you get this error, right?
>

I will try it out tonight and let you know.

Thanks,
Om

> -Alex
>
> On 12/9/13 10:48 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Dec 9, 2013 10:35 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> We keep hitting this error, but the mail archives do not document how
we
> >> fix it.  This time, we should write down the answer.  Om's hit it,
> >>Justin
> >> hit it, I think I had it once.  The emails seem to indicate that it
> >>ispath
> >> related, but the build.xml does at least check if the pbutil.exe exists
> >> and is passing on that.
> >>
> >
> >In my case, I have not been able to fix it.  In fact, if we are trying to
> >reproduce the problem, we could use my Mustella VM on Azure and see if we
> >can figure out what is happening.
> >We can then apply that fix to the windows1 slave on builds.apache.org
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Om
> >
> >> I'll try to see if I can repro on my windows box tonight.
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 12/9/13 12:16 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" <maurice.amsel...@systar.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Thanks Erik for the clarification.
> >> >
> >> >I confirm to you, I had to send the updated swc manually for testing
> >> >because the nightly build was down.
> >> >
> >> >Sorry, I didn't follow the thread from the beginning, so I checked the
> >> >archives, maybe have missed something.
> >> >
> >> >I can see from the build logs that pixel bender build failed and it
> >>seems
> >> >to be a path issue.
> >> >If that's correct, this is the path I am using on my local build in my
> >> >env.properties:
> >> >
> >> >env.PIXELBENDER_HOME=C:\\Program Files (x86)\\Adobe\\Adobe Utilities -
> >> >CS5\\Pixel Bender Toolkit 2
> >> >
> >> >I can see that in the build log, the path is:
> >> >
> >> >check-pixelbender-home:
> >> >     [echo] PIXELBENDER_HOME is C:/Program Files (x86)/Adobe/Adobe
> >> >Utilities - CS5/Pixel Bender Toolkit 2
> >> >
> >> >When I run it on my local env, it gives the following:
> >> >
> >> >[echo]
> >> >PIXELBENDER_HOME is C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\Adobe Utilities -
> >> >CS5\Pixel Bender Toolkit 2
> >> >
> >> >So maybe using "\" instead of "/" could fix the issue ?
> >> >
> >> >WDYT?
> >> >
> >> >Maurice
> >> >
> >> >-----Message d'origine-----
> >> >De : Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl]
> >> >Envoyé : lundi 9 décembre 2013 08:53
> >> >À : dev@flex.apache.org
> >> >Objet : [Builds/Jenkins] Help and advise needed
> >> >
> >> >Hi,
> >> >
> >> >I'm having some difficulty getting the 'regular' builds on 'build@a.o'
> >> >working. For those not subscribed to the builds list, the situation is
> >>as
> >> >follows:
> >> >
> >> >- there are supposedly 9 admins for the windows1 slave, but only one
is
> >> >sporadically active. I've requested access to the machine, but got the
> >> >answer: "nine is enough." A suggestions there was actually only one,
> >>with
> >> >8 ghosts fell on deaf ears. Apparently, it makes no sense to remove
> >>old,
> >> >inactive admins and add new, active ones
> >> >
> >> >- since the windows1 slave is old, full and overworked, it regularly
> >>went
> >> >down for days on end. We are one of the few projects that uses the
> >> >windows slaves, so I ended up being the guy who always complains the
> >> >slave is down...
> >> >
> >> >- the one active admin is now working on a second slave (windows2). In
> >> >itself, that is a very good thing. However, in his own words, "he
feels
> >> >entitled to use our builds to experiment." I feel that is wrong, but I
> >> >know better than to further aggravate my relation with him by
objecting
> >> >too strongly.
> >> >
> >> >The point of this elaborate introduction is this: somewhere in his
> >> >experiments he broke the Windows slaves for our builds. We have not
> >>had a
> >> >successful build in a week. Normally, not that big a deal, but with
the
> >> >third party IDE people working on FlexJS and the very active mobile
> >> >development both relying on nightly builds, I feel this is not a time
> >>to
> >> >NOT have clean, daily builds of all our projects...
> >> >
> >> >Anything 'negative' I say on the builds list will certainly make
things
> >> >worse - my NL temperament and lack of finesse often does not sit well
> >> >with US recipients ;-) - so I would ask you to please chime in on the
> >> >builds list and that we together get our builds back to functioning.
> >> >
> >> >Thanks!
> >> >
> >> >EdB
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >Ix Multimedia Software
> >> >
> >> >Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >> >3521 VB Utrecht
> >> >
> >> >T. 06-51952295
> >> >I. www.ixsoftware.nl
> >>
>

Reply via email to