Hi, > The person who answered on legal-discuss said he "would expect" that the > LICENSE file made it clear which files were mapped to these non-AL > licenses as well as having the correct headers in the source.
It clear from the header on those file and there's nothing about doing that at [1] so IMO while it might be a nice to have it's not required. My request to join legal-dicuss still hasn't been approved. Justin 1. https://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html
